AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Wendy Lampart

CHEM22 · CHM12A · CHEM1105 · CHM1A · CHM22 · CHEM1B · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself chemistry from the book and YouTube; expect and disorganization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingTough graderTest-heavy midtermsMust self-teachConfusing labs
  • Most students say lectures and and force heavy self-teaching.
  • and and low homework weight.
  • A and , but overall recommendation is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students often need heavy self-study for .

Online and and self-teaching; a few still earn As with major outside effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

and labs make the course feel advanced and .

Online students call videos erratic; in-person students say lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and not in others, with mixed skip-class warnings.

Online reviews often mark attendance no; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is about 20 percent and many comments say .

Online includes a strong DO NOT TAKE review; exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags, no curve, precise answers, and .

Format shift

; in-person repeatedly says tough grader and exams dominate.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, group labs, papers, and .

Format shift

; in-person adds ALEKS-style work and many midterms.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common , and forcing students to self-teach.

Format shift

A few online and in-person , but teaching quality reviews are mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Midterms and finals carry most of the grade while homework and .

Format shift

; online also stresses heavy graded work and confusing gradebook practices.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

support, slide reading, and needing peers or YouTube to pass.

Main concern

, no curve, and little effective lecture help.

What students said

“ if you know how to teach yourself.”
CHM1A
“There are 5 midterms, in person, no notes, each exam is worth 70% of the and she expects precise answers.”
Chem1B
“She is the . She doesn't help her students or teach us anything!”
CHM1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe , and a strong need to self-teach.

Main concern

Disorganization and unanswered questions make online chem especially punishing.

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself during this class if you end up with her as your instructor.”
CHEM22
“Professor extremely unorganized, confusing grading, and the amount of .”
CHEM1105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

no notes and no curve, making the policy strict for most students.

Test heavyIn-person midterms no notesNo curveHomework low weight

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Several reviews describe in-person midterms with no , and little alignment with lectures.

In-person midtermsNo notesNo curveExams dominate grade
“There are 5 midterms, in person, no notes, each exam is worth 70% of the and she expects precise answers.”
Chem1B
“ and their is no study guide.”
CHM1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring but and heavy graded work.

Hard assessmentsConfusing gradingHeavy homework
“the amount of .”
CHEM1105
“Dr. Lampart is and understand at times while she erratically jumps between sections of her lecture.”
CHEM22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you know how to teach yourself. and responds to messages, but and doesn't know what's going on in lab.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting disorganization, exam weight, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Disaster Risk

28/100

“She is the . She doesn't help her students or teach us anything!”

📝

28/100

“There are 5 midterms, in person, no notes, each exam is worth 70% of the and she expects precise answers.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ !”

📚

30/100

“A group of us pretty much had to teach ourselves all of the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and doesn't know what's going on in lab
  • She's a TERRIBLE lecturer, reads off the slides
  • Be prepared to teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ur cooked buddy

Theme 3

❤️ Mixed Personality Notes

  • She is very sweet and loves to teach
  • Dr.
  • Nice teacher but in honesty she is too lazy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed reviews with consistent disorganization and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHM1A7 reviews
CHEM225 reviews
CHM224 reviews
CHEM11052 reviews
Chem1B1 review
Show 1 more courses
CHM-12A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1