AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Trish Sullivan

ART10 · ART6 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Fine for an approachable art class if you can handle personality friction and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsEngaging lecturesAttitude polarizingGroup projectsHomework at start
  • Course content and grades look manageable, with two A+ and one B reported.
  • One student loves demos and feedback; another finds her pretentious attitude off-putting.
  • Only three reviews total, so confidence in any pattern is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students call the class easy or not tough and report A+ outcomes when they engage with projects and homework.

All evidence is in person; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Art appreciation and photography are described as manageable, though one studio .

All three reviews are in person across ART-10 and ART6.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others mark it mandatory, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, while one felt her attitude ruined an easy class.

All recommendation evidence is in person with only three samples.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Reported grades are strong and the class is called easy, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Art appreciation has journals and group projects; studio work includes lots of .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and engaging lectures are praised, but pretentious attitude comments pull the experience down.

Format shift

Teaching impressions .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and studio practice dominate over formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

teaching and disliking a pretentious vibe, while agreeing the class is not especially hard.

Main concern

Personality and tone can sour an otherwise easy course.

What students said

“ . Never use cellphone in her class.”
ART-10
“It was an easy class, but her attitude may have ruined the class for me.”
ART-10
“ and !”
ART6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects, journals, and studio work rather than a .

Group projectsJournal workStudio demos

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is described as , and painting rather than formal exams.

Group projectsJournal workLots of homework at start
“She left journal work, studied art work and .”
ART-10
“lots of .”
ART6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It was an easy class, but her attitude may have ruined the class for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with mixed praise and attitude concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ and !”

😐 Attitude Concern

35/100

“came off as pretentious always seeming better than everyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She has an engaging lecture style and got me laughing
  • She gave a lot of demos and shared some pro tips

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It wasn't a tough class.
  • It was an easy class, but her attitude may have ruined the class for me.

Theme 3

🎨 About Coursework

  • She left journal work, studied art work and .
  • lots of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with mixed tone and limited detail reduce reliability of any strong conclusion.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART-102 reviews
ART61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values