AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Steven Yukimoto

ANT2 · ANT1 · ANTH1 · ANT12380 · ANTHRO1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will attend, ask questions, and and tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLecture-heavyPolarizingUnclear rubricsInteresting if engaged
  • and .
  • Content is manageable if you attend, but grading and rubrics frustrate many.
  • and a few failures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

42/100

A grades are uncommon; and unclear criteria make high marks work-heavy.

; online evidence is limited and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Material is often called easy if you pay attention, but boring delivery and .

Both formats describe manageable content when students engage; online has one high-difficulty complaint.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance is repeatedly listed as .

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 70 percent would take again, but and engagement pull the score down.

; online sample is too small to trust alone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and comments about harsh term-paper scoring dominate many reviews.

Format shift

; online also notes tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Plenty of assignments and note-taking, but usually described as handleable if you attend.

Format shift

Both formats mention note-taking and regular assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Some find him inspirational and accessible; , and .

Format shift

Polarization is strongest in in-person reviews; online is thin and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly assignments, term papers, and .

Format shift

and term papers most clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students either love the feedback and worldview shift or call lectures boring with .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Gave most of the class D's for their Term paper... ”
ANT1
“Honestly he could be a but as long as you pay attention to class and get to know the professor by asking questions, he could be funny”
ANT2
“He changed the way I think about the world.”
ANT1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse online feedback ranges from patient with .

Main concern

and high perceived difficulty for some online students.

What students said

“Gives you opportunities to make a and understanding.”
ANTH1
“He just lectures and ”
ANT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often called straightforward if you attend, but papers and .

Tests if you pay attentionTerm paper heavyFew tests in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you listen, but term papers can be graded harshly.

Straightforward testsTerm paper grading risk
“ if you pay attention in class and do your work.”
ANT1
“Gave most of the class D's for .”
ANT1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools; one notes not many tests and .

Tests? Not manyNote-taking heavy
“His class does requires a lot of note taking but he gets off topic when he notices everyone is getting tired.”
ANTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly he could be a but as long as you pay attention to class and get to know the professor by asking questions, he could be funny and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (2 online, 11 in-person), highlighting polarized grading and engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“He changed the way I think about the world. and .”

⚖️

32/100

“Gave me a 20/50 due to failing to meet the but absolutely nothing was missing.”

📌 Attendance and Effort

22/100

“Very easy class if you pay attention!”

👎 Polarizing Delivery

40/100

“ because he doesn't specify exactly how he wants the assignments done.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not much of a personality until you ask questions
  • He just lectures and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • could be a
  • Very easy class if you pay attention
  • Makes class harder than what it should be

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • incredibly understanding
  • Gives you opportunities to make a better grade
  • truly cares about his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen mixed reviews with real grade detail and recurring themes, but opinions are polarized and online evidence is thin.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANT15 reviews
ANT25 reviews
ANT123801 review
ANTH11 review
ANTHRO11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1