AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ngao Kitonyo

CHEM1071 · CHEM22 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear instructionsTough graderPoor Canvas useConfusing lectures
  • , and weak Canvas navigation.
  • Lectures and board work are , and .
  • A couple of students still pass and call assignments easy if they show up, but most advise avoiding him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few students earned A or B+, but and .

All evidence is in-person; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Difficulty comes less from deep theory and more from confusion, missing guidance, and mismatched assessments.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warn you fall behind without class presence.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Roughly one in , and the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students report , and nitpicky standards.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many papers, print-your-own labs, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, tangents, late starts, and .

Format shift

In-person only; two outlier positive notes do not reverse the trend.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and tests that students say often mismatch taught material.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM sections are widely called messy and , with , and poor communication.

Main concern

, and tests on material not taught.

What students said

“I couldn't understand half of the things he was saying and writing on the board.”
CHEM-22
“There are and in assignments.”
CHEM-1071

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and labs feel strict and unpredictable because content and instructions are poorly aligned.

Tests on untaught materialUnclear due datesPrint-your-own labsNitpicky lab grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say tests include material never taught and .

Untaught test contentUnclear lab instructionsHarsh lab grading
“Last but not least, he tested us on stuff he never taught!”
CHEM-22
“ .”
CHEM-1071

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There's no reason for the class to be THIS messy. random chem papers he finds on the internet and expects you to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person chemistry reviews, highlighting disorganization, unclear assessment, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧯 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“I'd argue one of the doesn't work.”

📋

16/100

“There are and in assignments.”

🧪 Unfair Assessment

28/100

“he tested us on stuff he never taught!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Often fails to complete lectures going off on tangents.
  • NOT tech savvy, will not return emails

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The .
  • cover.

Theme 3

🧩 About Organization

  • Absolutely awful professor who was passive aggressive and
  • Says he will post or assign or give due dates, never does
  • canvas incompatible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

11 recent in-person reviews are highly consistent in criticism, but the sample is modest and has almost no positive detail richness.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM-10717 reviews
CHEM-224 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2