AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Miguel Manrique

MAT201 · MAT131202 · MAT3A · MAT13 · MATH24 · MAT27 · MAT24 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will attend every lecture, keep careful notes, and ; otherwise pick a clearer math lecturer.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyLots of homeworkTough graderAccessible outside classTest heavy
  • and and confusing.
  • Workload is consistently heavy with and frequent tests.
  • Tests often mirror class notes and , but grades still vary widely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earn As with curves and note-based tests, but and .

Nearly all grade ; the one online review gives no grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Math content plus fast lectures and high difficulty ratings make the material feel hard even when tests track class notes.

; online only notes confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory and warn that and .

; the online review said attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

fans praise care and .

In-person reviews are split; the lone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Curves, hints, and help some students, but Tough grader tags and low grades for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure show up across many reviews.

Format shift

Workload complaints are almost all in-person; online lacks workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Students praise accessibility and , but many report monotone, rushed, or .

Format shift

In-person is mixed; the online review is strongly negative on clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and quizzes drawn from notes.

Format shift

Assessment mix is described mainly in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and complaints about speed, dull explanations, and heavy homework.

Main concern

Fast or monotone lectures plus heavy online homework .

What students said

“ and he offers a lot of test curving and some .”
MAT27
“This was the most god awful math teacher ever. He never explained anything and made us do homework on a website that you cant use mobile without it deleting your math problems.”
MATH24
“genuine and chill .”
MAT13

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single and teaching quality very poor.

Main concern

Poor clarity and articulation with .

What students said

“ and poor articulation.”
MAT24

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams generally follow class notes and study guides with occasional hints or .

Note-based examsTest hintsSome curvingIn-class tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, sometimes with hints and curves but .

Note-based examsStudy guidesTest hintsCurving
“ off everything we do there in class.”
MAT27
“quizzes/tests and the .”
MAT201

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Manrique is extremely helpful and really cares about the success of his students! and he offers a lot of test curving and some .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews spanning 2017-2025, highlighting , and note-based exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

52/100

“he would write too quickly and not give much time to go back see past notes.”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“He gave a lot of homework and always assigned work over digital media that is usually glitchy or obstructive.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“I would definitely reccomend taking his math class.”

📝

58/100

“Just show up to class and because quizzes/tests and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Manrique showed genuine interest in his lectures and if you pay attention
  • he was also very dull in
  • He's a terrible teacher all over the place doesn't give a syllabus, never gets to the point

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • webworks which is very picky on grading, making it difficult to get a decent A
  • he offers a lot of test curving and some
  • Honestly one of the easiest classes I have ever took

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • All of the so be careful when inputing your answers
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews span 2017-2025 with mixed but detailed comments; opinions conflict, so credibility is solid but not high.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MAT132 reviews
MAT2012 reviews
MAT242 reviews
MAT3A2 reviews
MATH242 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MAT1312021 review
MAT271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values