AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Patricia Alexander

CHEM22 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will stay on top of , and labs; expect effort for a fair grade, not a free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkLecture HeavyFair If You WorkLots of NotesTimed Exams
  • Students say she is generally fair and helpful if , and notes from day one.
  • Course is demanding and fast-paced with heavy notes and assignments, but many still earn A or B.
  • some call her understanding, others say she shows attitude when asked simple questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Several students earn A or A+ when they study and complete all work; it is not automatic but rewards consistent effort.

Evidence is mostly in person; the single online review also reports an A- with steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is standard intro chem level but feels hard because of , and .

In-person reviews drive this judgment; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and success depends on being present for notes and lab.

In person is mandatory; the online review marks attendance not required for asynchronous work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and support, despite some personality and .

In-person opinions are mixed-positive; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

as fair with possible redos, bumps, and when effort is visible.

Format shift

In person mentions grade bumps and redos; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of homework, daily notes, labs, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of assignments; in person also emphasizes note taking and lab work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Many call her a good fair teacher who helps when you ask, but some report attitude and .

Format shift

; the online review is positive on manageability.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and finals all matter, with tutoring and available.

Format shift

In ; online is McGraw Hill assignment heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person CHEM22 is note-heavy and demanding, with and use tutoring.

Main concern

Fast pace, lots of notes, and .

What students said

“If you put in the work and actually try to learn then you will pass with an A.”
CHEM22
“lots of notes since day 1, very fast paced.”
CHEM22
“sometimes her notes do not match up with the tests.”
CHEM22

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One asynchronous review reports heavy , and moderate success with work.

Main concern

Must buy your own access and handle lots of .

What students said

“ ; everything was done on McGraw Hill.”
CHEM22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Timed midterms and and labs; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software details.

Timed Midterm and FinalHomework and LabsExtra Credit TutoringTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person timed midterms and finals are noted, plus labs and homework; some feel notes do not fully match tests.

Timed Midterm and FinalLabsLots of Homework
“Midterm and on one question.”
CHEM22
“sometimes she doesnt teach you everything needed to pass on the tests.”
CHEM22

Online

Online review says assessments lived on McGraw Hill with lots of assignments rather than Canvas tests.

McGraw Hill AssignmentsNo Canvas Lectures
“ ; everything was done on McGraw Hill.”
CHEM22
“LOTS of assignments, but moderate if you put the work in.”
CHEM22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the work and actually try to learn then you will pass with an A. She is fair and might even give you a grade bump if she sees that you put in the work throughout the semester”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (1 online, 7 in person), highlighting fairness, note load, and timed exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Alexander is a good professor but sometimes her notes do not match up with the tests.”

📝 Workload

34/100

“lots of notes since day 1, very fast paced.”

⚖️

58/100

“She is fair with grading as long as you are turning in the assignments.”

👍 Recommendation

62/100

“Demanding but laidback.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lots of notes since day 1
  • She is not the type to hold your hand but she will try to help
  • Good teacher but just not a good person

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • passing with A's was moderately challenging
  • Midterm and
  • sometimes her notes do not match up with the tests

Theme 3

🧪 About Course Work

  • LOTS of assignments, but moderate if you put the work in
  • and work with your group
  • Do the homework and take advantage of the 2 chances

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Eight mostly detailed CHEM22 reviews give a usable picture, but the small sample and only one online review keep confidence medium.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM228 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values