AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Emily Gutierrez

CSS1 · CSS2A · CSS169 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you , and use her feedback and exam reviews.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Grading CriteriaLots of HomeworkHelpful LecturesExam Reviews HelpfulCaring But Mixed Clarity
  • Most students would take her again and , and .
  • Weekly labs and programming assignments can be tedious or complex, especially online.
  • A , so effort and note-taking matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many earn A or A+ with and resources, but and occasional tough grading mean real weekly effort is required.

Online ; in-person reviews more often report easier As with attention.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Intro CS content is manageable with practice, yet pace and .

Online sections lean harder on weekly programming difficulty than some in-person CSS1 reports.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping class costs clarification and progress.

Online CSS2A has at least one non-mandatory case, while as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

About four in five and mixed clarity.

; online reviews are milder but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear criteria and and point deductions for late work.

Format shift

Online reviews more often call her an if work is on time; .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of homework, weekly programming assignments, labs, and .

Format shift

Online CSS2A especially flags complex weekly programming and tedious labs.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and caring support, with a smaller set calling lectures unclear or wrong.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online reviews are more neutral on lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly labs and , and sometimes a group final piece.

Format shift

and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often praise clear lectures, caring help, and and mixed comments on toughness.

Main concern

, and tough-grader tags appear.

What students said

“ . Really good lectures and is an amazing teacher.”
CSS1
“ . Great professor who tries to make the material as simple as possible.”
CSS1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CSS1 and CSS2A feel doable with and forgiving quizzes, but weekly programming work can be hard and .

Main concern

and occasional rushed lessons without strong live pace control.

What students said

“Lectures are enough , and , but you are given plentiful resources to complete them.”
CSS2A
“ lectures and examples provided but were doable.”
CSS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard CS mix of quizzes, midterms, finals, and and no clear lockdown-proctor claims.

QuizzesExam ReviewsMidterm and FinalGroup Final Project PieceClear Assignment Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some older reviews note tests covering lightly taught content.

Exam ReviewsMidterm and FinalLecture Supported Tests
“ .”
CSS1
“Many of the tests and labs (including the midterm and wasn't gone over in detail, if at all.”
CSS169

Online

Online sections mention forgiving quizzes, weekly programming, and a .

Forgiving QuizzesWeekly ProgrammingGroup Final Project
“ , and , but you are given plentiful resources to complete them.”
CSS2A
“Part of the so make sure to get a good group.”
CSS2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Really good lectures and is an amazing teacher. I loved this class so much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (3 online, 10 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She communicates very well and encourages everyone to participate.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“ while some weeks were easy.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“Very helpful and really enjoyed being in CSS1 and CSS2A with her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her ability to break things down in a manner you can understand helps

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you pay attention to lectures and
  • but

Theme 3

📝

  • , but you are given plentiful resources
  • Part of the so make sure to get a good group

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed reviews across online and consistent themes.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSS15 reviews
CSS2A4 reviews
CSS-12 reviews
CSS1692 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1