AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ramon Cisneros-Ruelas

PHIL15 · PSY2 · PHL2 · PHIL2 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and a fair path to an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirationalCaringAccessible outside classPowerPoint lecturesHardly any homework
  • All five reviews rate him a 5 with 100 percent would-take-again intent
  • , and free online textbook options
  • Tests are manageable with flashcards and , though

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Multiple students earned As with , and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is made easy to understand though some reading and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and one tag warns skip class and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review is highly positive and every .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students report As and a success-focused approach with .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Light

80/100

Comments , and a short paper.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Consistently praised as , and willing to work with struggling students.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Typical structure includes exams with PowerPoint-based review plus occasional short papers.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently praise caring, accessible teaching with and manageable assessments.

Main concern

and skipping can hurt your chance to pass.

What students said

“Hardly any hw, just make flashcards for his tests!”
PHIL15
“Very nice easy going professor. .”
PSY2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are studyable from PowerPoints and flashcards, with and at least one short paper.

PowerPoint-based testsFlashcards recommendedIn-person examsShort paper

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students study PowerPoints and flashcards for tests and may write a short paper; .

PowerPoint-based testsFlashcards recommendedShort paper
“ and will be good”
PSY2
“We took 3 exams and wrote a 3 page paper.”
PHIL2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cisneros was a great professor! Powerpoints/videos are his go to for lectures. Hardly any hw, just make flashcards for his tests!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting support, clarity, and light workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“He makes the material easy to understand/discusses current events so it's also relevant.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ .”

💚 Student Support

92/100

“Hes whiling to work with you if youre struggling.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures off a PowerPoint
  • makes the material easy to understand
  • wants your opinion and to participate in class discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hardly any hw, just make flashcards for his tests
  • Not difficult
  • and will be good

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very nice easy going professor
  • Caring
  • He wants you to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent 5-star reviews from 2017-2019 with and teaching comments support high confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL152 reviews
PHIL21 review
PHL21 review
PSY21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values