AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Albert Graham

AIT130 · AIT75 · MFGT7035 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you attend and engage; skip if you want deep theory over practical tasks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-On LearningMandatory AttendanceExtra CreditMixed ReviewsField-Oriented
  • Most students praise hands-on, real-world Ag and manufacturing work.
  • and skipping hurts your chance to pass.
  • One strong negative review says some courses are busywork, not educational.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades reported as B or A with , but you must show up and do the work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-to-high with in-depth field material and hands-on expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews and and that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Three of four students would take him again for hands-on teaching, despite one strong critic.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grading called more than reasonable with useful , but not a free A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Hands-on projects and real work keep students busy without being described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most students love involvement and feedback; one review says he only assigns simple tasks.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and practical tasks more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes emphasize hands-on projects, community , and .

Main concern

Course quality varies; one AIT75 review calls the work non-educational busywork.

What students said

“Lots of hands on and real work.”
MFGT7035
“His courses are not educational. Learning is stifled in his "classroom".”
AIT75

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and .

Hands-on projectsParticipation-based

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; evaluation focuses on hands-on work and participation.

Hands-on projectsParticipation
“Lots of hands on and real work.”
MFGT7035

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great Ag teacher that gets very involved and in depth with subject matter and students understanding of the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting hands-on praise versus one busywork critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“A great Ag teacher that gets very involved and in depth with subject matter”

🛠️ Hands-On Focus

80/100

“Lots of hands on and real work.”

⚠️ Course Quality Split

30/100

“His courses are not educational. Learning is stifled in his "classroom".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really helps students in any way possible
  • Gets very involved and in depth with subject matter
  • Doesn't teach beyond the lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ALWAYS put your name on everything.
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2016-2019 with mixed but detailed opinions provide moderate confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AIT752 reviews
AIT1301 review
MFGT70351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values