AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rachel Anderson

BIO5 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Skip if another BIO5 instructor is available; if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyGet Ready to ReadVague on ExamsHeavy Workload
  • BIO5 is material-heavy and few students earn As even with strong work ethics.
  • Grading is stricter than other BIO5 instructors and exams stay vague.
  • Attendance and SI help, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong effort often yields a B; few students earn As and is scarce.

All evidence is from in-person BIO5 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Anatomy content is dense, lecture-heavy, and .

All evidence is from in-person BIO5 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while two .

All evidence is from in-person reviews with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Only one of and peers recommend other BIO5 instructors.

All evidence is from in-person BIO5 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Tagged as a and almost no .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of reading and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Accessible and bubbly for some, but and weaker than other BIO5 teachers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Heavy reading and topics.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person BIO5 is lecture-heavy, reading-intensive, and graded more strictly than peer sections, with and lots of work.

Main concern

and too much material for the support provided.

What students said

“Getting an A is tough, few students get them & the amount of work you have to put into this class is alot.”
BIO5
“her grading scale is higher than other bio5 instructors & she is really vague when you ask ”
BIO5
“Very difficult class you need to read and study on your own in order to understand the material”
BIO5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard and students report little clarity on what to study.

In-Person ExamsVague Exam GuidanceLecture-Based

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a strict grading scale.

In-Person ExamsVague Exam Guidance
“she is really vague when you ask ”
BIO5
“Getting an A is tough, few students get them”
BIO5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Getting an A is tough, few students get them & the amount of work you have to put into this class is alot. Even with an A a B.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person BIO5 reviews, highlighting tough grading and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“There are Better bio5 teachers at hartnell than her”

⚖️

24/100

“her grading scale is higher than other bio5 instructors”

📚 Workload Intensity

26/100

“the amount of work you have to put into this class is alot”

🧠 Course Difficulty

22/100

“Very difficult class you need to read and study on your own in order to understand the material”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting an A is tough, few students get them
  • Even with an A a B
  • Hardly any E/c in the course

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is really vague when you ask
  • Lecture heavy

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • too much material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed in-person reviews from 2018-2019 agree on difficulty and but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO53 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values