AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Elsa Brisson

NUT51 · NUT0 · FCS23 · FCS22 · NUTRITION23 · FCS25 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you only need a low-effort grade and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganized lecturesDoes not teach contentEasy grade possibleUnresponsive emailsOff-topic class time
  • Most students , and teaches little nutrition content.
  • Class can still be an easy pass with .
  • Contact and office access are weak, and many urge avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students report easy As despite poor teaching, .

Online review also calls the class fairly easy; little learning.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is not intellectually hard; difficulty comes from disorganization more than complex material.

Both formats describe low academic challenge with uneven execution.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional or unstated in others.

; the online review does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students and unresponsiveness.

; the single online review also would not take her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Curves and late-work acceptance help some students, but others feel grades do not match effort or learning.

Format shift

; online focuses more on course chaos.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is often light, though online and some sections mention lots of .

Format shift

Online review tags lots of homework; in-person comments more often stress wasted class time.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant theme is confusing, off-topic lectures with little real instruction and weak communication.

Format shift

In-person reviews are harshest; online mainly criticizes disorganization.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Students mention online quizzes and exams plus papers, projects, and occasional reading.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews largely describe off-topic lectures, weak teaching, and frustration, with only rare praise for kindness or curves.

Main concern

Students feel they learn little and .

What students said

“She does not teach at all she spends 2 hours of class talking about nonsense.”
FCS25
“she is the . she was rude to students who asked questions.”
NUTRITION23
“Easy A but you do not learn much.”
FCS23

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review calls the class fairly easy but and little book use.

Main concern

and organization is poor.

What students said

“it was frustrating how disorganized this course was. and do as much as you can, because more may appear all at once.”
NUT51

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments often include online quizzes or exams and .

Online quizzes and examsCurve on midtermsPapers and projects

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often say quizzes and , and finals can salvage the grade.

Online quizzes and examsCurve on midtermsFinal can save grade
“Quizzes and .”
FCS23
“ and they were on a curve! ... A ”
NUTRITION23

Online

Online review notes a fairly easy course with lots of homework and .

Lots of homeworkGroup projectsExtra credit
“While this class is fairly easy and I am not completely opposed to taking this professor again, .”
NUT51

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not teach at all she spends 2 hours of class talking about nonsense. She talks about her weekend and life but what does that have to do with nutrition? .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (1 online, 11 in person), highlighting poor instruction, disorganization, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“i would not recomend taking any classes with her she is a terrible teacher. .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

📈 Easy Grade Despite Chaos

76/100

“Easy A but you do not learn much.”

🗂️ Disorganization

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not teach at all she spends 2 hours of class talking about nonsense
  • lectures are long, pointless and boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A but you do not learn much
  • The class was pretty easy
  • A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Access

  • so don't bother contacting her that way
  • Don't ask for help she has extreme mood swings
  • she was rude to students who asked questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across years show a consistent negative teaching pattern, though grade outcomes and a few positive notes create some mixed detail.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

FCS235 reviews
NUTRITION232 reviews
60271 review
FCS221 review
FCS251 review
Show 2 more courses
NUT01 review
NUT511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values