AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Foultz

ENG2 · ENG1A · ENG1B · ENG101 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will show up, participate, and use the ; skip her if you need strong direct writing instruction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyParticipation mattersEssay focusedRelies on SI/tutorsMixed organization
  • Many students like her energy, care, and generous .
  • Others say she under-teaches writing and leans too hard on SI or tutors.
  • Attendance and participation matter a lot; do the essays and you can still land an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

Heavy , get-out-of-jail cards, and if you submit work.

; the online review also reports an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Essay foundations and research are standard English work, not brain-melting, but not trivial either.

; online difficulty was moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and and you will not pass; lateness can get called out.

Attendance pressure is documented in in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but a vocal minority found her rude or unhelpful.

In-person opinions split; the lone online review is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, late-work chances, and assignment volume make failing hard for engaged students.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is strongest in in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and participation work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Students split between stellar, caring energy and complaints about under-teaching or SI dependence.

Format shift

Online review is glowing; in-person reviews are mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing work; few exams are mentioned overall.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and extra-credit friendly, but mixed on organization, feedback speed, and how much she actually teaches writing.

Main concern

and some students feel writing help is outsourced to SI or tutors.

What students said

“with so much it's impossible to not get an A and do all the assignments.”
ENG101
“If you need to learn how to write a . Was taught absolutely nothing.”
ENG1A
“She gives 3 summaries worth 105 points total!! That my friend, will help tons”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is highly , and inspiring with an A outcome.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence.

What students said

“Pretty chill teacher and ! She really does care for her students and always has a smile on her face everyday in class!!”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment-driven with few traditional exams, so but writing load is real.

Few testsEssay and journal heavyExtra creditParticipation grading

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with few formal tests.

Few testsEssays and journalsParticipation mattersExtra credit
“Tests? Not many”
ENG1A
“Class and researching random journal topics.”
ENG101

Online

Online ; it focuses on care and inspiration.

“Pretty chill teacher and !”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I think Professor Foultz is a stellar professor! i can see why people think this is a self-taught class but honestly she gives students a lot of freedom. She allows for and essays and tons and tons of ! with so much extra credit it's impossible to not get an A and do all the assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (1 online, 18 in person), balancing extra-credit leniency against mixed teaching support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“It is a self thought kind of class all she and if we need help we have to go to a tutor or the SI.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

🎁 Safety Net

79/100

“with so much it's impossible to not get an A and do all the assignments.”

⚠️

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun class and the class vibe is very open and energetic
  • Relied to much on SI rather than teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gives 3 summaries worth 105 points total
  • there is no way you can fail this class with the jail free cards
  • and presentations

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is also a
  • and caring
  • Do not be late she will yell at you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen mostly recent reviews give rich, mixed detail with a and credible minority dissent.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG1016 reviews
ENG22 reviews
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1