AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Oviedo

MATH24 · MAT24 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Fine for basic math if , but avoid his summer 24/25 sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-DrivenMixed Summer ReviewsMath Confidence BuilderMistake-Prone Lectures
  • Low-level math students can finish with an A and new confidence if they do the work.
  • Summer Math 24/25 reviews warn of lecture mistakes and high difficulty.
  • ; skipping it leads to failure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student earned an A in entry-level math with effort, but .

Online Math 201 reported an A; grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Entry math can feel manageable, but Math 24 summer felt very hard and error-prone.

Online entry course felt approachable; in-person summer Math 24 was rated much harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Helpful for anxious basic-math students who work, but summer .

Online Math 201 was praised; in-person summer Math 24 was not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

An A is reachable in low-level math with , but no evidence of free grades.

Format shift

Only the online Math 201 review mentioned finishing with an A.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

; reviews do not describe light or overwhelming loads consistently.

Format shift

on total hours.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Builds confidence in basic math for some students, but others report lecture mistakes in summer courses.

Format shift

Online entry experience was positive; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on homework completion as the path to pass or fail.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one summer warning about mistakes and high difficulty, one note that .

Main concern

Summer sections may include lecture mistakes and feel much harder.

What students said

“Do not take Math 24 and 25 with him during the summer. Follow by he will make mistakes.”
MAT24
“If you don't do your homework, and if to fail”
MATH24

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One positive online Math 201 review: scared beginner finished with an A and better math attitude.

Main concern

Only one old online review, so results may not generalize.

What students said

“I started his class with absolutely no confidence, and finished with an A, and with a new attitude about math.”
201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Math 201 review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I started his class with absolutely no confidence, and finished with an A, and with a new attitude about math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews spanning 2013-2014, highlighting confidence gains versus summer-course warnings. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I started his class with absolutely no confidence, and finished with an A, and with a new attitude about math.”

⚠️ Summer Course Risk

25/100

“Do not take Math 24 and 25 with him during the summer. Follow by he will make mistakes.”

📚

50/100

“If you don't do your homework, and if to fail”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • finished with an A, and with a new attitude about math
  • he will make mistakes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If ... you're going to fail
  • finished with an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2013-2014 with sparse tags, mixed tone, and limited grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2011 review
MAT241 review
MATH241 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1