AI Rate Professor

Education

Pat Henrickson

FCS14 · CD1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

If you want an enthusiastic, personable education-style instructor, she looks like a strong pick on limited data.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEnthusiastic teacherPersonableFlexible testsActivity-based learningApproachable
  • Both reviews rate her a 5 and stress enthusiasm and personal attention.
  • She uses varied activities and flexible test formats.
  • Sample size is tiny, so confidence should stay cautious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

, but flexible formats and support make a solid grade realistic with effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and teaching uses activities that help mixed learners.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review states a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students give top marks and call her great with no major complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

She lets students choose test formats, which softens assessment pressure.

Format shift

Based only on in-person CD1 comments.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Activities and tests appear regular, but no one describes an overwhelming load.

Format shift

Workload detail is limited and in-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Enthusiasm, personal attention, and time for questions dominate both reviews.

Format shift

Both reviews are in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Activities plus student-choice tests (multiple choice, true/false, etc.) share the load.

Format shift

Assessment notes come from in-person CD1.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as enthusiastic, personable, and and activities.

Main concern

Very few reviews, so the glowing picture may not cover every course.

What students said

“Very enthusiastic. She gets excited about what she is teaching.”
CD1
“Pat is a very personable teacher. She gets to know each pupil as an individual.”
FCS14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can feel somewhat hard, but .

Student-choice test formatMultiple choice optionTrue/false option

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CD1 notes that tests are somewhat difficult but students pick the .

Student-choice test formatMultiple choiceTrue/false
“ but she lets you pick how you want the . choice, true/false, ect.).”
CD1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pat is a very personable teacher. She gets to know each pupil as an individual. Pat always makes a . She is great!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting enthusiasm and flexible tests. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Energy

92/100

“Very enthusiastic. She gets excited about what she is teaching.”

❤️ Personal Attention

90/100

“She gets to know each pupil as an individual.”

📝 Flexible Assessment

82/100

“she lets you pick how you want the test (mult. choice, true/false, ect.).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very enthusiastic. She gets excited about what she is teaching.
  • Adds a lot of different activities to help all the students learn.
  • Pat always makes a .

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • but she lets you pick how you want the . choice, true/false, ect.).
  • She is great!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old positive reviews give little sample size or grade data for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD11 review
FCS141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values