AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Lisa Fuentes-Intveld

ABT131 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

and content-strong for food safety, but decide with more recent reviews if you can.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeableNice demeanorFood safety expertEasy course toneTextbook used
  • , and strong on produce food safety.
  • Difficulty is rated low, but there is almost no grade or workload detail.
  • Too little data for a strong recommendation either way.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Low , but no student describes how easy an A actually is.

Evidence comes from a single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Difficulty is rated 2 and the tone of the only comment is light, not technical-heavy.

Evidence comes from a single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

The sole review is clearly positive on knowledge and demeanor without naming major red flags.

Recommendation rests on one in-person comment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

No grade outcomes are reported, so leniency is only loosely inferred from low difficulty.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Light

70/100

Difficulty rating is low and the comment .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Described as nice, smart, and knowledgeable about food safety in produce.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

No assessment split is documented in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person ABT131 review praises her knowledge of food safety and friendly presence.

Main concern

Only one review, so teaching consistency is unproven.

What students said

“She's a and good looking professor who knows a lot about food safety in the produce industry”
ABT131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a and good looking professor who knows a lot about food safety in the produce industry”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting knowledge and demeanor. Credibility rating: Low.

🧠 Subject Knowledge

80/100

“knows a lot about food safety in the produce industry”

🙂 Demeanor

78/100

“She's a and good looking professor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About the Professor

  • She's a and good looking professor
  • knows a lot about food safety in the produce industry

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

One brief 2012 review without grades or workload detail yields low reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ABT1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values