AI Rate Professor

English

M Need

ENG4197 · ENG1B · ENG101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; experiences swing from voluntary two-semester fan to drop-the-class disaster depending on course level.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingHelpful for someUnhelpful for othersSarcastic styleAvoid upper-level for some
  • two love him, two call him terrible
  • Lower-level ENG fans praise help, encouragement, and subtle sarcasm
  • Upper-level ENG4197 students urge others to stay away and drop

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Difficulty ratings vary widely and grades are not reported; some find support while .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Mixed difficulty reports from easy ENG101 to harder ENG4197 with little consistency.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Half the reviews adore him and half tell students to stay away, so fit is highly course-dependent.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; one A/B student .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; difficulty scores range from 1 to 4 without clear assignment load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Split between extremely helpful and sarcastic for some versus uncaring and uninteresting for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on teaching personality and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

ENG1B and ENG101 students praise help and wit, while ENG4197 students call him uncaring and .

Main concern

Upper-level courses may feel unsupported; personality fit matters a lot.

What students said

“ and encouraging. He can really help you to understand the meaning of the texts.”
ENG1B
“TERRIBLE TEACHER stay away from his class. I was/am an A/B Student and .”
ENG4197
“he is not interesting..he suks”
ENG4197

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TERRIBLE TEACHER stay away from his class. I was/am an A/B Student and . Doesn't help and doesn't care about you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 polarized in-person reviews from 2010-2011. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarizing Reviews

45/100

“TERRIBLE TEACHER stay away from his class. I was/am an A/B Student and .”

❤️

85/100

“ and encouraging. He can really help you to understand the meaning of the texts.”

😏 Sarcastic Style

70/100

“He has an awesome subtle brand of sarcasm. I loved him so much I that I took him for two semesters voluntarily.”

👎 Negative Upper Level

20/100

“he is not interesting..he suks”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and encouraging.
  • He has an awesome subtle brand of sarcasm.
  • he is not interesting..he suks

Theme 2

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • TERRIBLE TEACHER stay away from his class.
  • Doesn't help and doesn't care about you.
  • .

Theme 3

👍 About Positive Experiences

  • I loved him so much I that I took him for two semesters voluntarily.
  • The top 3

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four older reviews (2010-2011) with strongly conflicting opinions and no grade data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG41972 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values