AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Steven Crowell

PHIL15 · PHL2 · PHL15 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid if possible; most students report confusion, sarcasm instead of help, and ruined interest in philosophy.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing LecturesTalks DownUnclear ExamsApatheticStay Away
  • Nearly all reviews rate quality at 1 with students feeling lost and talked down to.
  • and nearly impossible.
  • One mild review found him alright but boring; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even hard workers report because instructions are never clarified.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students feel constantly lost in lectures and cannot map textbook success to course assessments.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Overwhelming stay-away warnings about confusion, sarcasm, and apathy.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students struggle .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Main pain is confusing take-home tests rather than sheer volume of busywork.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe being lost, talked down to, and getting sarcasm instead of answers.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students largely describe two-hour lectures as unclear and demeaning, with directions.

Main concern

Sarcasm when asking questions and .

What students said

“ ! He made me feel so dumb and he always talked down to me.”
PHL15
“ and i didn't know what he was asking us .”
PHIL15
“ !”
PHL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but students say and nearly impossible to meet.

Take-Home ExamsUnclear Instructions

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe take-home exams with and little clarification.

Take-Home ExamsUnclear Instructions
“when .”
PHIL15
“I would try , but the and he would not clarify anything.”
PHIL15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He made me feel so dumb and he always talked down to me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting confusion, unhelpful tone, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He is a terrible teacher. He never lets you know whats going on. You are always lost in this class.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ if .”

📝

25/100

“when .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He would just talk about philosophy for 2 hours straight. A little boring at times.
  • I never understood anything that he was taking about.
  • When I would ask questions, I would get sarcasm but rarely a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I still don't get this course.
  • and i didn't know what he was asking us .
  • when .

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • He made me feel so dumb and he always talked down to me.
  • !
  • he stated to us he doesnt get paid enough to put in anything extra

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed and highly consistent negative reviews across years strongly align on confusion and unhelpful tone.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHIL155 reviews
PHL151 review
PHL21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values