AI Rate Professor

English

M. Lurdez Villarreal

ENG2 · ENGLISH2 · ENG101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you have any alternative; reviews paint a , and demoralizing experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCockyConfusing AssignmentsHarsh Toward StudentsDo Not TakePoor People Skills
  • Every scored review is 1 or 2 with zero positive quality ratings.
  • , and hostile interpersonal style.
  • Consensus advice is to run or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Students report she seems to enjoy flunking people and would have failed them without dropping.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings pair with comments that expectations and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Students urge others to deny the , and run from this instructor.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple students say she appears eager to fail people and grades by opaque opinion.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Pressure and confusion than from listed busywork volume.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews describe poor people skills, cockiness, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and failing pressure without detailing exam weight.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, confusing English instructor who seems eager to fail students.

Main concern

Hostile interpersonal style and .

What students said

“This woman should not be a teacher. She clearly does not have people skills.”
ENG101
“Confusing and is not capable of . Seems to enjoy trying to flunk students.”
ENG2
“She is the worse teacher i ever seen in my life.”
ENGLISH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format or proctoring; .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; focus is on confusing assignments and failing students.

“Confusing and is not capable of . Seems to enjoy trying to flunk students.”
ENG2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF HER CLASS IS THE ONLY OPTION!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and universal avoid warnings. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She is the worse teacher i ever seen in my life.”

👎 Recommendation

6/100

“Run!! Run fast.”

⚖️

12/100

“Seems to enjoy trying to flunk students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This woman should not be a teacher. She clearly does not have people skills.
  • Confusing and is not capable of .
  • She is very cocky & thinks shes all knowing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Seems to enjoy trying to flunk students.
  • Everything she does is all base on her opinion.
  • would have failed me had I not dropped.

Theme 3

🚨 About Warnings

  • Run!! Run fast.
  • IF HER CLASS IS THE ONLY OPTION!
  • unless you have to.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight consistently negative reviews with overlapping complaints about hostility and confusion support a high-confidence low rating despite some short comments.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG26 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values