AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Virginia Montelongo

AJJUVI · AJ202 · AJ116 · AJ10 · JUV111 · AJ15 · AJ201 · AJ014 · AJ13 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are comfortable with APA writing, independent work, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAPA strictWriting-heavyInconsistent feedbackTough graderMixed organization
  • Recent reviews often , and heavy writing workloads.
  • Positive reviews , and clear when students follow directions.
  • Online reviews are especially risky, with , and weak responses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Some students earned As by doing the work, but and .

Online reviews make the A feel harder because of APA papers and communication issues, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The criminal justice content can be manageable, but , and organization issues raise the challenge.

Online reviews describe heavier execution demands, while in-person reviews range from .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and presence matter, and one review says she dropped a student over disputed absences.

, while online reviews focus on due dates and modules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many recent students , and poor communication.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while and recent strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students , and little tolerance for formatting mistakes.

Format shift

Both formats show strict grading, with the clearest APA complaints in online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Work often , and full-page responses.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the workload as especially heavy and repetitive.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

She has some strong supporters, but many students report , confusing organization, and unhelpful responses.

Format shift

Online teaching receives more severe criticism, while and partly older.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and responses.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments more than traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with older praise for practical teaching and and strict APA expectations.

Main concern

and inconsistent communication can make the class frustrating.

What students said

“ .”
AJ10
“ .”
AJ13

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, stressing weekly , and hidden assignments.

Main concern

Students report and heavy asynchronous writing demands.

What students said

“ .”
AJ201
“So .”
AJ13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and some midterm review, but do .

QuizzesShort Quiz TimeMidterm Reviews Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterm reviews, but do not clearly prove exam book policy or .

QuizzesMidterm Reviews Mentioned
“ chapters in advance.”
AJ10
“ .”
JUV111

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or lockdown software.

QuizzesShort Quiz Time
“She also gave little time in quizzes.”
AJ116
“each week there was a quiz, discussion, and writing assignment.”
AJ116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't like writing .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

18/100

“When she wants APA format, you must have it in APA format with no mistakes, period.”

📝 Workload

25/100

“So .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

40/100

“She was a great professor!”

Theme 1

📝 About APA And Writing

  • .
  • but long af.

Theme 2

⚠️ And Feedback

  • .
  • No work is worth 100% to her after a month being in her class.
  • .

Theme 3

👍 About Positive Experiences

  • She wants you to succeed and is willing to help you when needed.
  • Very quickly responded to my emails and questions.
  • Always willing to help students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews provide useful detail, but opinions vary sharply and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

AJ136 reviews
AJ104 reviews
AJ1164 reviews
AJ2012 reviews
JUV1112 reviews
Show 4 more courses
AJ0141 review
AJ151 review
AJ2021 review
AJJUVI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values