AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Kara Potter

PEDIN003 · N003 · NURSPEDI · NURS112 · NURSING · NURSIPEDN · NURS001 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can handle a hard nursing course with inconsistent support and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard classStrict but fairMixed teaching qualitySlow feedbackOld reviews
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students calling her helpful and knowledgeable while others describe her as one of .
  • The course is consistently described as difficult, especially in nursing and pediatrics contexts.
  • The only recent review is online and , and poor responsiveness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A appears difficult because the nursing material is hard, grading is strict, and there is little evidence of grade leniency.

In-person evidence repeatedly calls the class hard, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content is challenging nursing material, even in positive reviews that praise her help or knowledge.

, while the online review does not provide much content-difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

Recommendation is weak because praise is balanced by severe complaints, and the only recent review is strongly negative.

In-person reviews are mixed and old, while the single online review is current and negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students describe her as strict or tough, with .

Format shift

The online review includes a , and and strict standards.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload appears heavy because nursing students repeatedly describe the class as hard and challenging.

Format shift

In-person reviews support high difficulty, while the online review and feedback.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching and serious complaints about attitude, knowledge, and support.

Format shift

, while but mostly old.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The and graded assignments than projects or discussion-based assessment.

Format shift

The online review explicitly mentions an exam and assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and split between strong praise for knowledge and help and severe criticism of attitude or clinical knowledge.

Main concern

The class is hard and the teaching experience appears inconsistent across students.

What students said

“Good prof, she's strict but fair”
N003
“it's a hard class, but she does a great job explaining things.”
PEDIN003
“ .”
NURSPEDI

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is , and poor email responsiveness.

Main concern

Students may not get timely grades, comments, or replies.

What students said

“She takes forever.”
NURSING
“not very good at providing comments and .”
NURSING

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams but do not clearly prove the .

Exam Scores DelayedExam Format Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

The online review mentions an exam and delayed score posting, but does not clearly prove .

Exam Scores Delayed
“It's been three days since I've taken the exam and she still hasn't posted the test scores.”
NURSING

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good prof, she's strict but fair”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching quality, high difficulty, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , but she does a great job explaining things.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

31/100

“ .”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“Was chalanging but helped me meet the goals.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good prof, she's strict but fair
  • Thought she was extreemly knowledgable in patho, answered all my questions well.
  • She is not a good instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Support

  • it's a hard class, but she does a great job explaining things.
  • Was chalanging but helped me meet the goals.
  • Dr. Potter is extremely slow with

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • not very good at providing comments and .
  • Good luck getting a reply.
  • No clinical experience at all, she is all based on the book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because there are only 11 reviews, most in-person reviews are very old, and the only recent review is online.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

N0034 reviews
NURSING2 reviews
NURS0011 review
NURS1121 review
NURSIPEDN1 review
Show 2 more courses
NURSPEDI1 review
PEDIN0031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values