AI Rate Professor

English

Sherryanne Lim

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG001 · ENGL102 · ENGL001 · ENGLISH1A · ENG102 · ENGL001A · ENGL106 · ENGL001B · ENG001B · 132 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.39%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are willing to tolerate heavy , and uneven course structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing loadSlow communicationTough gradingFrequent cancellationsHelpful for persistent writers
  • Reviews are sharply split, but recent in-person comments are very negative about cancellations, communication, and lack of teaching.
  • Online reviews repeatedly , and tough formatting expectations.
  • Some students say she improves writing and rewards effort, but many warn the workload and support gap are severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A is possible if instructions and formatting are followed exactly, but the , and .

Online reviews emphasize high-volume essays and strict formatting, while and uneven class meetings.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The English content is not conceptually extreme, but , and unclear instruction raise the challenge.

Online reviews make the workload feel harder, while weak or inconsistent.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

because many in-person reviews focus on her cancellations rather than a consistent student attendance rule.

In-person evidence shows frequent class cancellations, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students warn against the class because of heavy , and inconsistent teaching.

Online reviews are mixed but workload-heavy, while recent in-person reviews are much more negative about cancellations and lack of instruction.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Many reviews call her a and stress exact formatting, though some students say effort or can help.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly mention strict formatting and grading, while inconsistent grading.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly describe daily , and constant assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially intense about daily assignments, while and printing requirements.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students improved as writers, but many cite poor communication, delayed grading, videos instead of teaching, and cancelled classes.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on slow replies and , while and weak classroom instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Reviews overwhelmingly describe essays, papers, discussions, reading, formatting, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online reviews especially focused on repeated essays and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with older praise but many recent complaints about , and poor communication.

Main concern

and work is not graded promptly.

What students said

“She was always absent and never taught anything when she was present, only played the same videos.”
ENG001
“Overall, the , and effective teaching.”
ENGL001A

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews often describe constant essays, lots of , and occasional strong learning gains.

Main concern

The online workload is heavy and communication is often poor.

What students said

“Homework EVERYDAY (2-3 assignments) and .”
ENGL001A
“If you want to be a better writer this is your teacher.”
ENGL001B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but , and a final essay in some sections.

EssaysResearch PaperFinal EssayNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy, but one review describes a final as a long sourced essay.

Final EssayPrinted AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Also the 10 sources.”
ENG001B
“Never graded work for the class until the last two weeks.”
ENG001

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or , but and research papers.

EssaysResearch PaperNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“10 small HW assignments, 2-3 discussions and 2 essays a and final.”
ENGL001A
“she gives you only a and write AT LEAST 4000 words.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Manageable class but lots of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Overall, the , and effective teaching.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Homework EVERYDAY (2-3 assignments) and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ !”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • She gives out a LOT of homework.
  • Way too much work within a short amount of time.
  • My To-Do List is full of .

Theme 2

📩 About Communication

  • .
  • PAID ANYWAY
  • She is unresponsive with her emails so keep that in mind.

Theme 3

✍️ About Learning And Writing

  • If you want to be a better writer this is your teacher.
  • I did learn how to write tho
  • She definitely pushed me to become a better student.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

132

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and , and consistent picture despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 528
3 out of 59
2 out of 58
1 out of 536

Course coverage

ENGL001A13 reviews
ENG1A8 reviews
ENGL1A8 reviews
ENG0014 reviews
ENG001B4 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG1024 reviews
ENGL001B3 reviews
ENGL0012 reviews
ENGL1021 review
ENGL1061 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 2 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

15

B+ 5 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2