AI Rate Professor

Business

Joshua Kas-Osoka

EDCO180 · BIS135 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you and tolerate strict, inconsistent grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsHarsh gradingCondescending toneGroup projectsPoor communication
  • Students overwhelmingly describe unclear directions, poor communication, and hostile or condescending interactions.
  • Grades can still be high, but students report harsh or and .
  • Both online and in-person reviews are negative, with and in-person reviews focusing on tone and projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

High grades are possible, but students , and major projects that make the A costly.

Online reviews stress unclear directions, while and project-heavy frustration.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels difficult mainly because instructions, rubrics, and .

and vague guidelines, while in-person difficulty comes from poor guidance and group projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One review says skipping class will prevent success, and the .

In-person evidence mentions attendance risk directly, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

7/100

Students do not recommend him because , and unfair grading.

Both formats are negative, with and in-person reviews detailing the reasons.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report , and grading that feels inconsistent or emotional.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews provide stronger detail about harsh and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe too much work for the unit value, group projects, reading, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and test-heavy structure, while and excessive project weight.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews , and condescending communication.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on confusion and lack of direction, while and poor clarification.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and heavily weighted group projects rather than relying on one method only.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and reading, while and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report , and harsh or inconsistent grading.

Main concern

Students say he gives little clarification and .

What students said

“he gave absolutely no guidance on what to even do to complete the project.”
BIS135
“his teaching is horrible.”
EDCO180
“This professor grades based on emotion rather than the .”
BIS135

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe unclear Canvas organization, vague guidelines, and a strongly negative experience.

Main concern

The main issue is lack of .

What students said

“His class is awful, it feel like he's lost in canvas and .”
BIS135
“ . if you can.”
EDCO180
“Very annoying professor and .”
EDCO180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test HeavyGroup ProjectsProjects Worth More Than Final

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and large projects, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Projects Worth More Than FinalGroup Projects
“ ”
BIS135
“More 50% of .”
BIS135

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy structure but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Test Heavy
“His class is awful, it feel like he's lost in canvas and .”
BIS135

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Level

7/100

“ . if you can.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“even though I'm sure i'm gonna pass, his teaching is horrible.”

⚖️

12/100

“This professor grades based on emotion rather than the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Communication

  • His class is awful, it feel like he's lost in canvas and .
  • his teaching is horrible.
  • and is unwilling to provide clarification.

Theme 2

⚖️ and Rubrics

  • and rubrics are nonexistent
  • This professor grades based on emotion rather than the .
  • he gave absolutely no guidance on what to even do to complete the project.

Theme 3

🧩 About Projects and Workload

  • For a two-unit class, he does too much.
  • More 50% of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are fewer than ideal, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent in their negative themes.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

EDCO1804 reviews
BIS1353 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1