AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

M. Cortese

AUTO181A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle a demanding, practical course with uneven student experiences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing reviewsTough gradingPop quizzesHands-on labsHeavy workload complaints
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who praise practical labs and students who call the teaching poor.
  • Negative reviews describe very , and heavy work.
  • Positive in-person reviews suggest the hands-on lab environment can work for students who like direct instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Grades look difficult because , and high difficulty ratings.

Online evidence is mostly negative and suggests heavy work, while and tough quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course seems intellectually and practically demanding, especially for students who struggle with reading, tests, and lab expectations.

students, while online reviews give little evidence of .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One online review says students were made to stay after class for , and .

The strictest attendance concern comes from an online review, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because the review set is polarized and the negative reviews are severe.

Online reviews are strongly avoidant, while experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tags and comments , and low grades for some students.

Format shift

Online reviews include tough grading and heavy work complaints, while and positive lab feedback.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Workload appears heavy because reviews mention lots of , and long assignment sessions.

Format shift

Online evidence is the strongest for heavy workload, while , and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with harsh negative comments balanced by two in-person reviews praising practical, hands-on help.

Format shift

, while and includes meaningful praise for lab instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and pop quizzes, with labs also important in the in-person experience.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and assignments, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with two strong positives about practical labs and and quizzes.

Main concern

Pop quizzes and tough grading may frustrate students who need predictable structure.

What students said

“he is a awesome professor.”
AUTO-181A
“He no good teacher”
AUTO-181A
“ , but not overly complex.”
AUTO-181A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing poor , and very high difficulty.

Main concern

Students report poor support, heavy work, and a hostile class experience.

What students said

“He's the ”
AUTO-181A
“he is no good teacher”
AUTO-181A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam and quiz environment appears strict because comments and tags mention pop quizzes, test-heavy structure, and .

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or final exam format.

Pop QuizzesTest Heavy
“ , but not overly complex.”
AUTO-181A
“He no good teacher”
AUTO-181A

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy and but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam rules, or .

Test HeavyTough Grading
“he is no good teacher”
AUTO-181A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but not overly complex.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting the polarized teaching, workload, and quiz themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“He will get to the point and in the daunting task look easy.”

⚠️ Student Risk

38/100

“He's the ”

🧪 Assessment Pressure

28/100

“ , but not overly complex.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is a awesome professor.
  • He no good teacher
  • He will get to the point and in the daunting task look easy.

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Tests

  • make us doing the
  • , but not overly complex.
  • He no good teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but the comments are recent and show a consistent split between very negative and very positive experiences.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

AUTO-181A5 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2