AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Cindy Bevan

AJ010 · AJ14 · AJ11 · AJ10 · AJ110 · AJ15 · AJ014 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
72.92%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you are interested in criminal justice and can handle strict deadlines, heavy work, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesTough graderHeavy workloadStrict deadlinesExtra credit available
  • Bevan inspires many criminal justice students with engaging stories, real-world experience, and strong lectures.
  • Recent and online , and sometimes unclear or slow communication.
  • The , and care about criminal justice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is realistic for , and use , but it is not low-effort because grading and workload can be strict.

In-person reviews more often call the class manageable, while online reviews more often stress heavy work and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject is understandable and often well taught, but reading, papers, quizzes, discussions, and .

Online reviews describe more self-teaching and workload pressure, while and clearer class interaction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and deadlines are strict, with and does not accept late work.

, while online reviews emphasize strict due dates and no late submissions.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

She is worth it for motivated AJ students, but the recommendation is limited , and polarized recent reviews.

, while online reviews are much more mixed and include several strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students frequently call her a , though can soften the impact.

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with online and deadline rigidity.

Workload

Heavy

29/100

The workload is often described as lots of , and group work.

Format shift

Online reviews report heavier pressure and self-management, while excessive workload.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Her best reviews praise passionate, engaging lectures and real-world police stories, but and poor support.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is stronger and more positive, while online evidence is more mixed and includes communication concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment blends homework, discussions, , and some exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, assignments, and LockDown Browser testing, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, emphasizing engaging lectures, practical stories, and fair success for students who participate.

Main concern

, and strict grading can still make the course demanding.

What students said

“Her lectures are straight forward as well as the quizzes and final.”
AJ010
“Attendance does matter since she if you start skipping.”
AJ010
“This class requires more work than 2 of my other classes combined”
AJ010

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising organization and while , and no late work.

Main concern

Online students most often complain , and LockDown Browser in one review.

What students said

“NEVER AGAIN! This professor acts as if her class is the only thing in your life.”
AJ010
“If you put in the work you will get an A.”
AJ010
“Does not accept late work.”
AJ010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or straightforward quizzes but also timed quizzes, proctored testing, and one LockDown Browser complaint.

Open-Note QuizzesTimed QuizzesLockDown Browser MentionedProctored Exam MentionedFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-note quizzes, straightforward quizzes and finals, group and solo tests, and , but do not clearly prove book rules for .

Open-Note QuizzesGroup and Individual QuizzesFinal ExamProctored Exam Mentioned
“the as they are open note.”
AJ010
“Her lectures are straight forward as well as the quizzes and final.”
AJ010
“1 .”
AJ010

Online

Online reviews , and one use of LockDown Browser, but do not clearly prove webcam rules.

Timed QuizzesLockDown BrowserFinal Based on Smaller TestsQuizzes
“Uses that creepy online LockDown Browser software for testing.”
AJ010
“ .”
AJ010
“the taken into one”
AJ010

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in effort and time you'll do great in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Her lectures are super interesting.”

⚖️

32/100

“She is a .”

📚 Workload Reality

29/100

“This class requires more work than 2 of my other classes combined”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are interesting and engaging she tells amazing stories.
  • Loved how she connects what she is talking about to actual cases or scenarios.
  • She teaches the material really good.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • She gives a lot of homework.
  • Earned an A but boy did I have to work for it.
  • Stay on top of your work for guaranteed A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Strict Policies

  • Does not accept late work.
  • Attendance does matter since she if you start skipping.
  • Uses that creepy online LockDown Browser software for testing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and provide detailed, format-specific evidence, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 554
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

AJ01027 reviews
AJ1012 reviews
AJ114 reviews
AJ143 reviews
AJ152 reviews
Show 2 more courses
AJ0141 review
AJ1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 6 · A 14 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3