AI Rate Professor

Business

Patricia Maroudas

BIS12 · BIS017 · BIS07 · BIS106 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if possible, because students consistently praise the experience while the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringFunnyHelpfulClear gradingParticipation matters
  • and describe her as funny, caring, helpful, and clear.
  • Getting a strong grade is realistic if , and study for quizzes.
  • The single online review is much weaker and reports textbook-driven learning, inaccessible modules, and webcam-proctored exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A high grade looks very achievable with , and quiz study, but not from doing nothing.

The Easy A evidence is mostly in person, while the one online review earned an A+ but described poor support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students generally describe the material as easy to understand, though and quiz preparation.

and manageable, while the online review says students must learn from the textbook.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance and participation matter, but comments do not show a .

In-person comments emphasize being present and participating, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and reasonable in person.

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, while the lone online review is negative and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear fair and reasonable, with and strong outcomes for students who complete the work.

Format shift

; online grading evidence is limited to one A+ with a negative experience.

Workload

Moderate

67/100

The , and papers, but students often call it manageable or easy.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe manageable work, while the online review criticizes long unhelpful slides rather than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe her as one of , and clear explanations.

Format shift

Teaching is highly praised in person, but the online review reports weak lecture support and poor module access.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Comments , and occasional group work, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

, and group work; online evidence only clearly mentions exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

expectations, and reasonable workload.

Main concern

Students still need , and prepare for quizzes.

What students said

“She was awesome and funny, and pretty laid back with deadlines.”
BIS017
“You just and study for quizzes , and you'll pass.”
BIS017
“Overall if you listen and .”
BIS017

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the asynchronous class relies on textbook learning and has weekly access problems.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves from the textbook while dealing with tech issues.

What students said

“You do the learning right out of the textbook.”
BIS017
“ .”
BIS017

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because the online review confirms webcam proctoring, while and tests without clear policy details.

Webcam Proctored Online ExamsQuizzesTests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

QuizzesTests
“ and sometimes does group work.”
BIS017
“You just and study for quizzes , and you'll pass.”
BIS017

Online

The online .

Webcam Proctored Exams
“ .”
BIS017

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is one of the so far in evc.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She is one of the so far in evc.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“Great teacher. .”

⚖️

78/100

“Overall if you listen and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she was a great professor, funny, helpful.
  • Had her for coding and medical terminology. She made the class enjoyable while still learning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You just and study for quizzes , and you'll pass.
  • the work load is pretty fun and honestly easy.
  • The answers are all in the book.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • You do the learning right out of the textbook.
  • She's not tech-savvy so expect .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years are mostly consistent, though the online format has only one review.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIS0178 reviews
BIS123 reviews
BIS071 review
BIS1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values