AI Rate Professor

History

Patricia Tirado

HIST017A · 17A · HISTORY001 · HISTORY17A · HIST17A · HIST17B · HIST014 · HIS001 · HIST035 · HIST022 · HIS017A · HIST017B · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
36.84%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her only if , and a polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture heavyStrict deadlinesDisorganized notesPolarizing personality
  • Students are sharply divided, but negative reviews repeatedly , and disorganized or hard-to-read lectures.
  • Getting an A is possible, especially for disciplined note-takers, but students must follow instructions exactly and meet firm deadlines.
  • Online reviews emphasize long video lectures and strict modules, while , and classroom strictness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments show the grade depends on exact formatting, deadlines, notes, and studying rather than low effort.

Online reviews suggest weekly work can be straightforward but strict, while , and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The history content is not always conceptually hard, but , and strict grading make the course feel harder.

Online difficulty comes from long videos and strict modules, while and hard-to-read notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Attendance or lecture engagement is strongly needed because quizzes, exams, and and videos.

Online students must watch videos closely, while and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because of , and , despite a smaller group of strong supporters.

Both formats include strong warnings, though online reviews also include a few students who found the and manageable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students frequently describe tough grading, zero tolerance for late work, strict formatting, single submissions, and .

Format shift

stressing due dates and in-person reviews stressing formatting, grammar, and exams.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is heavy because students report long lectures, lots of , and strict deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload centers on videos, weekly writing, and quizzes, while , and lecture-based assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Reviews are polarized, but repeated complaints about rude tone, rambling lectures, messy notes, and disorganization outweigh the positive praise.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize long videos and tone, while , and classroom strictness.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, discussions, essays, exams, finals, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, discussions, and essays, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews emphasize fast lectures, difficult note-taking, , and mixed views on her passion.

Main concern

The main concern is having to capture messy or fast lecture notes because exams and .

What students said

“ and half the time her writing is very hard to see.”
HIS017A
“Literally write down every word she is saying.”
HIST17B
“If you show up, ask questions, & actually try, you'll do just fine.”
HIST035

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe long lecture , and some straightforward weekly structures.

Main concern

The main concern is strict grading paired with long or videos.

What students said

“She has a zero tolerance for , and lectures are visually and audibly unorganized.”
HIS017A
“Strict timelines, Get ready for Tough Love.”
HIST017B
“Watch the lecture videos, easy A!”
HIST17B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some reviews describe open-book or easy quizzes, while and strict grading.

Open Book Online TestStrict DeadlinesLecture-Based ExamsEasy MCQ QuizFinal ExamNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lecture-based tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based TestsQuizzesFinal ExamStrict Grading
“You would need to study a lot to pass the .”
HIS017A
“need to .”
HIST035
“ but good luck writing it down because she talks really fast.”
HIST17B

Online

Online reviews mention open-book tests, easy multiple-choice quizzes, and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Open Book TestEasy MCQ QuizMidterm Format ChangeNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The because it's an open book.”
HIST017B
“ .”
HIST017B
“she will also change your midterm from mc/tf to a frq.”
HIST17A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an easy A with no effort, this isn't the class for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“lectures are visually and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“She has a zero tolerance for ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures can go off topic.
  • and info provided out of order.
  • All the info you need is in her lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you show up, ask questions, & actually try, you'll do just fine.
  • Easy class and Easy A+, but you have .
  • she will give you a if there's anything wrong with it

Theme 3

⏱️ About Structure & Deadlines

  • Do not expect to turn in .
  • Strict timelines, Get ready for Tough Love.
  • Course is not open early to work in advance.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because it uses 38 detailed reviews split across 18 online and 20 in-person experiences with consistent format-specific patterns.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 519

Course coverage

HIST017B11 reviews
HIST017A7 reviews
HIS017A4 reviews
HIST17A3 reviews
HIST17B3 reviews
Show 7 more courses
HIST0222 reviews
HIST0352 reviews
HISTORY17A2 reviews
17A1 review
HIS0011 review
HIST0141 review
HISTORY0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 4 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 4