AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Sid Singh

ENGINNEERING · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Sid Singh if you want a clear and encouraging.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational lecturesCaring and respectfulClear explanationsSupportive classroom
  • Students describe him as , and motivating.
  • The course does not appear effortless, but students feel supported through the work.
  • All reviewed students rated him highly and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades look strong and students feel supported, but the reviews still mention assignments and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students say he breaks down the class clearly and helps struggling students understand assignments.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and creates an encouraging classroom.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The available grades are strong, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Students mention assignments and textbook reading, but no one describes the workload as heavy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and inspiring.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention assignments and textbook reading but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews , and a positive classroom mood.

Main concern

Students should still read the textbook and keep up with assignments.

What students said

“He always had the class in a good mood and and respectful.”
Enginneering
“When Professor Singh talks, students listen with .”
Enginneering

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Exam policy unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely one of ! don't forget to read the textbook thoroughly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He always had the class in a good mood and and respectful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Definitely one of !”

❤️ Student Support

95/100

“He always tried to help students when they were struggling and made .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When Professor Singh talks, students listen with .
  • Very good teacher, also very chill.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He always tried to help students when they were struggling and made .
  • He always had the class in a good mood and and respectful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed enough, and highly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Enginneering4 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values