AI Rate Professor

Education

Nasreen Rahim

DLIT502 · EDIT010 · EDIT022 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

She can be a good choice for , but if you need a light workload or highly consistent instructions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized When GoodHeavy Workload RiskCaring SupportClear CriteriaLast-Minute Stress
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with recent positive comments but severe older complaints about workload and organization.
  • Many students earned A grades when they kept up with assignments and readings.
  • The biggest risk is workload spikes, confusing instructions, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are common, but students still need , and occasional heavy work.

Online evidence is mixed between easy A paths and severe workload complaints, while but very limited.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The material is often described as understandable, but confusing instructions and .

Online reviews drive the mixed difficulty picture, while as easy or guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

and makeups, but one in-person review reports mandatory meetings and attendance rules are not consistently described.

Online evidence supports deadline flexibility, while course.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and supportive, but several strongly warn against workload, confusion, and last-minute guidance.

Online recommendation is polarized, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reported A , and clear criteria suggest leniency when students complete the work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention extensions and makeups, while but .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Several students describe lots of , and one extremely time-consuming course.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest heavy-workload warnings, while but not an overwhelming load.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

She is often described as , and tech-savvy, but negative reviews cite disorganization, poor communication, and .

Format shift

Online teaching quality is highly mixed, while but based on only two reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy with discussions, practice work, quizzes, readings, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment detail, while , and meetings.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person evidence is small but positive, describing a and some required meetings.

Main concern

The sample is too and required work.

What students said

“3 mandatory meetings and rest of the course was asynchronous.”
DLIT502
“ .”
EDIT010

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, ranging from well-organized and , and stressful.

Main concern

Online workload and instruction clarity vary sharply by course or term.

What students said

“Easily one of the most time consuming classes I have ever taken.”
EDIT022
“The and she's very tech-savvy.”
EDIT022

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with some weekly quiz and final references but .

Quiz WeeklyFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, proctoring, webcam, or open-book policies.

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Weekly QuizFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“A and quiz weekly.”
EDIT010
“final will be on 12/19 only 4 days and we have to study half of the book.”
EDIT010

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and she's very tech-savvy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is a wonderful professor, she not only cares for her students but also wants to see them succeed in the world of IT.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“This 3 credit class gave me more work than my two 5 credit STEM classes combined.”

⚖️

72/100

“If you put in a decent amount of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The and she's very tech-savvy.
  • Bad teacher. Bad attitude. Unorganized. Unprofessional.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put in a decent amount of .
  • The material and and do.
  • Too hard, too much.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • Easily one of the most time consuming classes I have ever taken.
  • You turn in about 6 assignment every 2 weeks
  • A and quiz weekly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The review set has 12 comments across years, but credibility is reduced by polarized experiences and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EDIT0107 reviews
EDIT0223 reviews
DLIT5022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1