AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Melody Barta

ACCT2021 · BUS21 · ACCTG2021 · ACCTG001B · ACCT001A · ACCTG20 · ACCTG1A · ACCT1A · ACCT001B · ACCTG001A · ACCT021 · ACCT1B · ACCT20 · ACCT202 · ACT20 · ACT21 · ACCT020 · ACCT21 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
64%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can, but expect , and exams to drive the course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsHeavy homeworkTest focusedHelpful in personCostly textbook tools
  • , especially for clarity, support, and exam preparation.
  • Grades can be very , and use allowed notes.
  • Online reviews raise major concerns about paid , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic with , and , but online sections and some 1B reviews make it less effortless.

, while online reviews describe harder exams and more self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Accounting content is manageable when reviews and , but many students still call the and sometimes confusing.

In-person sections seem clearer and more scaffolded, while online sections make the content feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but reviews, quizzes, participation, and in-class problems make showing up important.

In-person evidence stresses attendance and review value, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but online criticism lowers the overall recommendation.

In-person recommendation is strong, while online recommendation is mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades are often helped by notecards, reviews, , and , though some students call exams tricky.

Format shift

reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and exams appear often enough that the workload is not light.

Format shift

, but online reviews describe the workload as more frustrating and less supported.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students praise her clarity, care, and support, but a sizable minority say she mostly summarizes the textbook.

Format shift

Teaching experience is much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and review work, with tests carrying major weight.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, homework, and exams, while and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students , and helpful support.

Main concern

Students , and .

What students said

“ as a cheat sheet.”
ACCT1A
“The reviews are very similar to the exams, so !”
ACCT020
“Does not really teach anything and you have to read and .”
ACCT1B

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split but lean negative because students report , and stricter exams.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves from the textbook and .

What students said

“She doesn't teach anything.”
ACCTG001B
“She will make you use proctorio for exams.”
ACCTG20
“Each week had a discussion, quiz, and homework, but nothing was hard.”
ACCT001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because and review-based exams, while online reviews mention strict proctoring and harder exams.

Notecard AllowedReview-Based ExamsTest HeavyRespondusProctorioLimited Notes

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reviews and allow a notecard, but some older reviews call exams tricky.

Notecard AllowedReview-Based ExamsTest HeavyTricky Exams
“ as a cheat sheet.”
ACCT1A
“The reviews are very similar to the exams, so !”
ACCT020
“ .”
ACCT1B

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Respondus, Proctorio, limited notes, no textbook on exams, and difficult exams in some sections.

RespondusProctorioLimited NotesNo TextbookDifficult Exams
“she requires students to download a program called Respondus”
ACCT001A
“Does .”
ACCTG20
“She will make you use proctorio for exams.”
ACCTG20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Loved Professor Barta! Actually enjoyed accounting before it went online due to the pandemic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Very knowledgeable and knows how to teach.”

📈 Grade Path

76/100

“Easy A just show up to reviews only as you'll be in groups and that matter.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“PPTs are just the textbook chapters summarized, and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She helps make a boring subject easy to understand and if .
  • She doesn't really teach anything.
  • Clear and very understandable in her lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • . Easy A.
  • She allows you to make a 3x5 note card with whatever you want which helps immensely.
  • 3 exams, 1 final, and 1 project.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Each week had a discussion, quiz, and homework, but nothing was hard.
  • A lot of homework but it definitely helps you understand the concepts.
  • You pay $99 just to do difficult HW&read an unhelpful textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent themes despite some format differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ACCT209 reviews
ACCT001A6 reviews
ACCT0205 reviews
ACCTG205 reviews
ACCT214 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ACCT001B3 reviews
ACCT1B3 reviews
ACCTG001A3 reviews
ACCT20212 reviews
ACCTG001B2 reviews
ACCT0211 review
ACCT1A1 review
ACCT2021 review
ACCTG1A1 review
ACCTG20211 review
ACT201 review
ACT211 review
BUS211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2