AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Charlie Kahn

AASTUDIES · WOMS010 · ETHN20 · AACULTURE · SOCSCI20 · AFRICANAMER · ETH011 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take Kahn only if you can tolerate unclear lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy gradingOpen-book testsDisorganized teachingHeavy reading and papersStrict attendance risk
  • Grades are often easy because tests are open-book and appears, but workload can be heavy.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply mixed, with some students learning a lot and .
  • Attendance can matter heavily, including one severe report of failing for missing a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A is usually realistic through , and , though heavy papers can raise the effort.

Online evidence includes an easy A with heavy weekly work, while in-person and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is usually described as easy or interesting, but and .

Online reviews mention tangents and unclear instructions, while and useless.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because multiple reviews say absences affect grades, including one report of an automatic F for missing a required day.

Online evidence says not to have too many absences, while in-person evidence contains the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, which many describe as disorganized, unclear, or opinion-heavy.

Online reviews are mildly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and , but attendance penalties and a few failing complaints reduce confidence.

Format shift

Online reviews support easy high grades with work completed, while and harsh attendance consequences.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but online WOMS010 and several paper-heavy comments show real workload spikes.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier, while papers.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Kahn is described as kind and sometimes engaging, but many students report , and weak command of material.

Format shift

Online reviews are more forgiving about support, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and participation rather than relying on only one assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly work and final papers, while , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews repeatedly call the class easy and often open-book, but teaching quality and .

Main concern

and strict attendance penalties.

What students said

“Open book, open notes.”
ETHN20
“If you don't attend, you will get an F.”
WOMS010

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy grades, but one review reports a heavy weekly workload and .

Main concern

Heavy weekly reading, discussions, papers, and .

What students said

“Beware of heavy course load!”
WOMS010
“Shes a good teacher and its really not hard to pass her class.”
ETHN20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because , but online exam policy is not clearly proven.

Open Book TestsOpen NotesTake-Home MidtermFinal PaperExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly support open-book or open-notes tests and a .

Open Book TestsOpen NotesTake-Home Midterm
“also open book for tests as well.”
ETHN20
“ .”
WOMS010

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“However, her class is easy. Open book, open notes. 5 page paper due at the end of the semester. Easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ , but is somewhat disorganized, not the most tech savvy, instructions sometimes unclear.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“Do good on the tests and write a and youll get an A.”

⚠️

25/100

“If you don't attend, you will get an F.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Several chapters of reading, discussion, and 1-2pg paper EACH WEEK.
  • Not much homework (4 assignments) and the .
  • Make sure you do all of the assignments and turn them in on time.

Theme 2

📝 About Grades

  • But do all the work and you're guaranteed an easy A or high grade.
  • Lots of to make up for ... also open book for tests as well.
  • if a student for a lightning easy 'A', this is the right class.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • More than half of the semester has passed and I still dont know what shes trying to teach.
  • a great teacher, couldn't ask any one better to teach african american studies.
  • She talks about life, she uses real life examples and brings people to a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews span many years and formats with repeated patterns about , and workload.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ETHN206 reviews
WOMS0103 reviews
AACULTURE1 review
AASTUDIES1 review
AFRICANAMER1 review
Show 2 more courses
ETH0111 review
SOCSCI201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values