AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jason Chang

PHIL060 · PHILO60 · PHIL010 · PHILOSOPHY10 · PHIL10 · PHIL60 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want engaging philosophy lectures and are willing to read, write, participate, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesReading HeavyParticipation MattersEffort For AEngaging
  • Chang is widely praised for energetic, interesting lectures, especially in person.
  • Grades are achievable, but students must keep up with , and essays.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because missed assignments, quizzes, and heavy writing can hurt grades quickly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic, but it depends on consistent , and not missing assignments.

Online reviews stress heavier grading risk from missed work, while through attendance and studying.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The philosophy content is understandable and engaging, but the , and abstract questions add real challenge.

Online sections feel more work-intensive, while because lectures carry the course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but lecture participation and daily journals make showing up important.

, while online reviews focus on weekly participation deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend Chang for engaging lectures and meaningful learning, with hesitation around workload and .

, while online reviews are split between strong recommendations and warnings about workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong, but multiple online students warn that missed assignments and .

Format shift

and more deadline-sensitive, while as fairer and more manageable.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The course often , and projects.

Format shift

Online workload is consistently heavy, while but , and studying.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Chang is often described as , and engaging, though online lecture materials can feel outdated.

Format shift

teaching, where lecture media and workload create more complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and projects rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, final exam, and , while , and reflection projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students usually praise Chang's lectures as , and memorable, with exams and projects described as manageable when students attend and study.

Main concern

Attendance and lecture attention matter because exams and journals often depend on class material.

What students said

“Professor Chang's lectures are amazing.”
PHIL010
“Pay attention in his lectures as the exams and entirely based on them.”
PHIL010
“Come to class because his class is all lecture, but .”
PHIL010

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are reading-heavy and consistently complete all work.

Main concern

Missing assignments or underestimating discussions, quizzes, and .

What students said

“Every week, you must read and discuss (in 300-500 words) with your peers.”
PHIL010
“If you participate and put in the work you'll get an A.”
PHIL010
“I thought this class would be easy, but it was very hard to try to get an A.”
PHIL010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard to moderately demanding, with online reviews mentioning hard quizzes and a while as lecture-based and manageable.

Weekly QuizFinal ExamEssay ExamLecture-Based ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as lecture-based and often manageable, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based ExamsEasy ExamsStudy GuidesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Easy exams and 1 doable reflection project at the end of the semester.”
PHIL010
“Pay attention in his lectures as the exams and entirely based on them.”
PHIL010
“study for the .”
PHIL010

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, two exams, a , and a three-hour essay final, but .

Weekly QuizTwo ExamsThree-Hour Essay FinalFinal ExamExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Final exam is a 3 hour essay and . 7 page essay.”
PHIL010
“There will be 2 exams and they are HARD.”
PHIL010
“the not to bad but still tough.”
PHILOSOPHY10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Chang's lectures are amazing. He's very energetic and passionate about the way he teaches philosophical topics, which makes you think a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Chang's lectures are amazing.”

📈 Effort For Grades

68/100

“If you participate and put in the work you'll get an A.”

⚖️

55/100

“ but he will destroy your grade don't and I mean it don't!!! ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's very energetic and passionate about the way he teaches philosophical topics, which makes you think a lot.
  • He really makes you think.
  • Mr. Chang made Philosophy interesting and his lectures were not boring!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Every week, you must read and discuss (in 300-500 words) with your peers.
  • Must read the textbook, necessary for the and .
  • He does give a lot of homework and goes accordingly to the syllabus, but he doesn't always collect the homework.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you participate and put in the work you'll get an A.
  • I thought this class would be easy, but it was very hard to try to get an A.
  • Pay attention and you will get an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews span many years and both formats, with consistent , and assessments.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 53
3 out of 57
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL01013 reviews
PHIL0605 reviews
PHIL102 reviews
PHILOSOPHY102 reviews
PHIL601 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1