AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Shreeyukta Singh

CHEM30B · CHEM015 · CHEM030A · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if , and inconsistent communication in exchange for possible grade leniency.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized course setupEasy grading for someHeavy busyworkUnclear communicationPolarizing teaching
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, with strong praise from some and severe frustration from others.
  • Many negative reviews focus on disorganization, , and exam mistakes.
  • Grades can be high because , but and manage busywork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report easy grading, , lenient late work, and high grades if you complete the work, despite frustration and busywork.

, while online reviews show high grades but more complaints about unclear expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The chemistry content is not always described as hard, but , and advanced content make the course harder than needed.

Online reviews describe confusing resources and mismatched quizzes, while and advanced or unrelated assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

One review says attendance is not mandatory, but and .

In-person evidence is mixed, while online reviews do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students value lenient grading enough to tolerate disorganization and .

Online evidence trends more negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Multiple students call her an easy grader or mention full points, , and lenient late work, though some also report harsh or .

Format shift

In-person reviews most strongly support leniency, while online reviews .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly , and time-consuming busywork.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, with online students .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Positive comments praise care and passion, but many reviews report disorganization, unclear materials, poor communication, and rude responses.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The class , and exams rather than relying on only one assessment type.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes, homework, and exams, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and strong complaints about disorganization, strict lab rules, and unrelated work.

Main concern

The in-person experience varies widely by course and student tolerance for .

What students said

“She is an . You get 100 as long as you do the work.”
CHEM30B
“ .”
CHEM015
“Super messy and lazy.”
CHEM30B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing incomprehensible , and unclear expectations.

Main concern

Online students report disorganized materials and .

What students said

“her resources & presentations were incomprehensible.”
CHEM-030A
“All the and hw.”
CHEM30B
“ .”
CHEM015

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

sheets and helpful review answers while others report mistakes, unclear expectations, or outside-class exam issues.

Cheat Sheet MentionedExam Mistakes MentionedOutside-Class Exam ConcernPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and outside-class exam expectations, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Cheat Sheet MentionedReview Answers MentionedOutside-Class Exam Concern
“She granted a cheat sheet for exams.”
CHEM30B
“she always do zoom meeting during the meeting she gives the .”
CHEM30B
“Wants students to show up OUTSIDE OF and shames those who can't.”
CHEM30B

Online

Online reviews mention exam mistakes and unclear detail expectations, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Exam Mistakes MentionedUnclear Detail ExpectationsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“She deducted 20 pts off for one of the exams even though i got everything right because it wasnt enough details according to her.”
CHEM30B
“ , or not mentioned in class.”
CHEM30B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an . You get 100 as long as you do the work. if you have time for busywork.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“By far the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“ . .”

⚖️

76/100

“Easy class if you do the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All the and hw.
  • Her innovative teaching methods and genuine passion for her subject matter create an engaging and enriching classroom environment.
  • I like ochem becoz of Prof. Singh.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • She is an . You get 100 as long as you do the work.
  • at end, shes lenient w LATE WORK.
  • HW and because the content is more advanced than her 2 minute lecture videos with simple examples.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • Assignments and .
  • Did not set a due date on some of the quizzes and would just close them all of a sudden.
  • She doesn't give out answers for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 recent reviews provide detailed, repeated patterns, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CHEM30B12 reviews
CHEM0155 reviews
CHEM-030A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1