AI Rate Professor

English

Ulises Palmeno

ENG001C · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if and , but be ready for delayed feedback and a writing-heavy English course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient gradingExtra credit availableLate feedback riskLots of writingUnderstanding teacher
  • Students generally describe him as kind, understanding, and lenient with grades or late work.
  • The , and inconsistent communication through Canvas or email.
  • The class , and papers, but improves the grade outlook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Lenient grading, , and flexibility with late work make a and papers.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is manageable but , and communication issues that can add friction.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One review says he does not like missed class, though and concerned for students.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, and kindness, but recent reviews warn about feedback and communication problems.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students directly call him very lenient and mention , fair grading, and late-work flexibility.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students mention lots of , and many papers, even though .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is described as caring, respectful, and understanding, but recent reviews cite poor communication and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on essays, homework, reading, grades, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a lenient and caring professor with , but recent and poor online communication.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Very lenient grader, but .”
ENG001C
“There are many options if needed.”
ENG001C
“ .”
ENG001C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, .

Policy Not Clearly Proven
“I wasnt able to turn in canvas closed.”
ENG001C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very lenient grader, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Good at answering and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Loved the amount of and had a good year with him as my teacher.”

⚖️

86/100

“Very lenient grader, but .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • There are many options if needed.
  • Very lenient grader, but .
  • .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good at respecting your question
  • Good at answering and
  • very good person, always ask about their day

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • Communication was also challenging, as emails and .
  • unless you like not getting feed back
  • I received little feedback on essays, making it difficult to improve.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 7 reviews exist, but they include recent detail and a and communication concerns.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG001C7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1