AI Rate Professor

Physics

Gholamreza Brojerdi

MATH21 · FINITEMATH · MATH025 · MATH25 · MATH63 · PHYS2A · MATH72 · MATH072 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself and , and uneven grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesTest heavyLots of homeworkTough gradingSelf-study needed
  • Recent physics reviews are strongly negative , and exams.
  • Older math reviews are mixed to positive, but they are outweighed by recent detailed criticism.
  • Students often describe him as nice, but many say the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible in some math courses, but most comments , and unclear grading expectations.

Online evidence suggests a fair A is reachable, while and more grading frustration.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content is often described as dense, math-heavy, fast-paced, or because .

The online Calc II review calls the class fast paced and dense, while and labs.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one in-person review frames the class as mostly showing up for lectures and tests.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most recent because students find the and the class test-heavy.

The only online review recommends him, but most in-person reviews, especially recent physics ones, are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and exams, though some older reviews say he is fair.

Format shift

Online grading is described as fair, while and exam weight.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and a cumulative final covering many chapters.

Format shift

Online workload is not described as light, and and test-heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Many students say he is nice but specific questions.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades , and online homework.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions fair exams, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative or mixed, especially in physics, with , and test-heavy grading.

Main concern

Students may need to learn much of the material independently.

What students said

“You'll need to study on your own and hope for if you get him as your professor.”
PHYS2A
“Lecture is just reading from the pre-made slides, and .”
MATH025

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive, describing a fast-paced but fair Calc II class with .

Main concern

The class was still fast paced and dense.

What students said

“While the class was fast paced and dense, he did try his best to explain everything in detail to prepare us for .”
MATH72

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

a , though one online review says exams were fair.

Test HeavyCumulative FinalWeekly QuizzesMultiple ExamsFair Exams In One Online Review

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final covering all chapters, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Weekly Quizzes3 ExamsFinal ExamTest Heavy
“Had weekly quizzes, 3 exams, a final, and all hw due at end of semester.”
PHYS2A
“put ALL 10 CHAPTERS COVERED on the .”
PHYS2A

Online

The , but it does not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Fair Exams
“he did try his best to explain everything in detail to prepare us for .”
MATH72

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll need to study on your own and hope for if you get him as your professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 , and exam patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Lecture is just reading from the pre-made slides, and .”

⚖️

30/100

“ for a percentage error any higher than 10%, which is most of the time.”

📚 Workload And Exams

25/100

“Had weekly quizzes, 3 exams, a final, and all hw due at end of semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , so he actually couldn't answer any specific questions.
  • He's a nice guy but I don't suggest him for a math teacher.
  • He is a wonderful teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you are not proficient in math then his class will be difficult.
  • Gave partial credit on exams and took the .
  • He extends due dates. Gives random . .

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs And Exams

  • and .
  • Doesn't tell you and marks off for not including some those things.
  • put ALL 10 CHAPTERS COVERED on the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years include detailed and mostly consistent patterns, though the strongest negative .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHYS2A4 reviews
MATH0252 reviews
FINITEMATH1 review
MATH0721 review
MATH211 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH251 review
MATH631 review
MATH721 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values