AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Syed Zaidi

ENGIN10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless no alternative exists and you can manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesTough gradingPoor communicationTest mismatchCost concern
  • Every review gives the lowest quality rating and warns against taking him.
  • Students describe disorganized teaching, poor communication, and .
  • Workload feels like busy work, with complaints about unnecessary Pearson costs and random schedule changes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Grades are possible, but students , and almost no reliable support for earning high marks.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Intro engineering becomes difficult because , and explanations are weak.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews mention participation and sudden online session changes, but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students unanimously warn against taking him because of , and mismatched exams.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students call him a and say exams and .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload is described as busy work with labs, Pearson assignments, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

6/100

Reviews consistently describe him as , and unprofessional.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and participation, with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, describing , and unreliable communication.

Main concern

Students say the class is confusing, poorly managed, and .

What students said

“ .”
ENGIN10
“ .”
ENGIN10
“ !”
ENGIN10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report difficult, mismatched exams, missing promised formula sheets, and pop quizzes.

Difficult Exam QuestionsMissing Formula SheetPop QuizzesTest Content Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult exams, missing , and pop quizzes.

Difficult Exam QuestionsMissing Formula SheetPop QuizzesTest Content Mismatch
“would give difficult questions on the .”
ENGIN10
“He said he would provide a formula sheet for exams, but never did.”
ENGIN10
“he chooses to give the students pop up quizzes instead.”
ENGIN10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course management. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

6/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

2/100

“ .”

⚖️

12/100

“He's also a tough grader, almost impossible to get a 100% on any assignment.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super boring class.
  • .
  • and just makes you go through the process.

Theme 2

📈

  • would give difficult questions on the .
  • He said he would provide a formula sheet for exams, but never did.
  • He's also a tough grader, almost impossible to get a 100% on any assignment.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Management

  • .
  • would randomly say today's session is online, sometimes only 20 minute notice.
  • He made us buy Pearson for $100, and only used it for 3 times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent enough and perfectly consistent in their negative assessment.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGIN105 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1