AI Rate Professor

Law

Ronald Cabanayan

LA36 · LA40 · LA46 · LA72 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a practical law class and are willing to keep up with reading, writing, and attendance.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReal-World Law PracticeClear LecturerHeavy Reading and WritingAttendance MattersTough but Helpful
  • Students praise his practical legal experience and real-world paralegal preparation.
  • The class , and attendance.
  • Grades are achievable, but students must follow his expectations closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

A grades are common, but students must read, attend, follow directions, and complete substantial writing work.

Online evidence is positive but limited to one review, while effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The and practical, but the , and tricky questions make it intellectually moderate.

Online comments frame the challenge as thought-provoking, while and writing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple students say attendance matters, and .

Both formats suggest attendance matters, with and homework.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

because he teaches practical law clearly and prepares students for paralegal work.

The online review is highly enthusiastic, and most in-person reviews are also strongly positive despite workload concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

He can be a and deducts points for not meeting expectations, but students say .

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly discuss grading leniency.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and long writing assignments.

Format shift

Heavy workload , while the single online review does not describe workload volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe him as , and eager to help.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and tests rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

, and tests, while the online review only mentions questions and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and strong legal preparation, but also serious workload, reading, writing, and .

Main concern

Students , and attendance.

What students said

“There is a lot of homework.”
LA72
“Try not to miss a class, !”
LA40
“He TELLS you how to pass his class.”
LA72

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is very positive, emphasizing interesting lectures, real-world connections, and tricky but useful questions.

Main concern

The single online review says skipping class will hurt performance.

What students said

“Lectures are interesting and relevant.”
LA36
“The questions he asks may be tricky, but they really do get you thinking.”
LA36

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and non-cumulative sections, not proctoring or open-book policies.

Non-Cumulative TestsTricky QuestionsNew Material by Section

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Non-Cumulative TestsNew Material by Section
“His testing is not cumulative.”
LA72
“Expect new material for the next section to follow.”
LA72

Online

The online review mentions tricky questions but does not clearly .

Tricky Questions
“The questions he asks may be tricky, but they really do get you thinking.”
LA36

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He TELLS you how to pass his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and I love that he incorporates everything we learn to the real life job we are preparing for!”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“There is a lot of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Value

82/100

“Hands down the best!!!! If you if you really want to get into law and want practice with things we will be encountering as paralegals.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and lectures clearly on the assigned reading.
  • Lectures are interesting and relevant.
  • He TELLS you how to pass his class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is a lot of homework.
  • .
  • but overall this was a great class!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Real-World Value

  • He's an actual Attorney and he teaches you how it is in a Law office.
  • No other professor will give you the practice you need.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years give consistent teaching and workload signals, though the online sample is only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LA723 reviews
LA361 review
LA401 review
LA461 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1