AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Margaret Hamza

QUICKBOOK030 · ACCTG030 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself through software, textbook work, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught CoursePoor CommunicationHeavy HomeworkSlow GradingNot Recommended
  • Most students say she does little direct teaching and leaves students to learn from software or the book.
  • , and helpfulness are frequent complaints.
  • The course workload feels high, and students report and poor support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show the grade requires self-teaching, careful software work, and .

Online reviews include A grades but , while and include a failing grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The material becomes harder because , and assignments require detailed software work.

Both formats describe confusion, but online reviews emphasize software and textbook self-learning more.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , so flexibility cannot be judged with confidence.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because , and forced to teach themselves.

Online reviews contain one positive outlier, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students mention tough grading, delayed grading, few graded items, and .

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on slow or , while and test-heavy tags.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report weekly discussions, quizzes, assignments, software submissions, lots of homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats support heavy workload, with online reviews .

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Most students say she does , and communicates poorly.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews are both negative, though online has one positive outlier.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention , and tests, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly quizzes and assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and lack of care.

Main concern

Students report , and test-heavy structure.

What students said

“ and .”
ACCTG030
“ .”
QUICKBOOK030

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe a self-taught course run through McGraw Hill or software, with , and .

Main concern

Students say she does not teach much and provides poor communication or feedback.

What students said

“She does not teach the class, basically 99% of the .”
ACCTG030
“She and when she does reply her replies are useless!”
ACCTG030
“ .”
ACCTG030

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes and test-heavy classes, but do not clearly prove open-book, .

QuizzesTest HeavySoftware Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book exams, proctoring, midterm, or .

Test Heavy
“Lots of homework”
ACCTG030
“Test heavy”
QUICKBOOK030

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and software assignments but do not clearly .

Weekly QuizSoftware Assignment
“You mainly do 1 discussion, 1 quiz, and 1 assignment per week.”
QUICKBOOK030

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not teach the class, basically 99% of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

14/100

“She does not teach the class, basically 99% of the .”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“You mainly do 1 discussion, 1 quiz, and 1 assignment per week.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

16/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not teach the class, basically 99% of the .
  • and .
  • read the book and do the assignments.

Theme 2

📩 About Communication

  • She and when she does reply her replies are useless!
  • She doesn't really grade hw on time or herself.
  • The grade them for like months.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Read the text carefully, I can't express how annoying it was to go back to fix every small thing on the hw because I did something slightly wrong.
  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews across online and positive outlier.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ACCTG0304 reviews
QUICKBOOK0303 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1