AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Maria de Pino

ESL091 · ESL302 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are confident, self-directed, and prepared for heavy work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkLow HelpTest HeavyMixed Teaching
  • Most reviews are strongly negative and .
  • One in-person review is very positive and .
  • The overall pattern suggests high risk, especially for students who need active writing support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

An A is possible for one student, but , and heavy work.

Online evidence is strongly negative, while but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course appears demanding because students cite lots of , and .

Both formats suggest challenge, but the online review especially emphasizes being left to figure things out alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags say skipping class leads to failure, and there is .

Online and no proof of lenient attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and weak support.

The online review is fully negative, while but remain mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Three of four outcomes are failure or withdrawal, and multiple students directly call out tough or .

Format shift

Online evidence describes no help and withdrawal, while but lean harsh overall.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews and tags mention lots of homework and test-heavy expectations.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One student praises her enthusiasm and essay help, but most comments describe poor support and negative learning outcomes.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is very negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Student tags repeatedly mention test-heavy grading along with lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person and online tags both support test-heavy assessment, though .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split, with one strong praise for essay help and and wasted time.

Main concern

and heavy workload create a high risk of withdrawal or failure.

What students said

“ ”
ESL091
“You can feel her enthusiasm in teaching, and I disagree with the comment saying that she grades terribly.”
ESL302
“ ! She grades horribly and you will end up wasting your time.”
ESL302

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and says she did not help the student improve writing.

Main concern

The student felt unsupported and withdrew.

What students said

“She WILL NOT HELP you improve anything.”
ESL091
“ as soon as you can because she wont help you improve your writing.”
ESL091

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest test-heavy and strict assessment risk, but they do not clearly .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
ESL091
“ ! She grades horribly and you will end up wasting your time.”
ESL302

Online

The online review and tags suggest test pressure but do not clearly .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as soon as you can because she wont help you improve your writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Whenever I asked her for help, she said that I dont read enough and told me to go back and read it again.”

⚖️

15/100

“She grades horribly and you will end up wasting your time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Support

  • She WILL NOT HELP you improve anything.
  • Whenever I asked her for help, she said that I dont read enough and told me to go back and read it again.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • She grades horribly and you will end up wasting your time.
  • I disagree with the comment saying that she grades terribly. I didn't see it at all.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the negative pattern is strong and includes detailed online evidence plus repeated withdrawal outcomes.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL0912 reviews
ESL3022 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2