AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Carmen Garcia

AJ112 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle poor communication and last-minute workload without much support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationUnclear syllabus follow-throughOverwhelming workloadLast-minute assignments
  • The only review reports a very negative online experience with poor communication and syllabus issues.
  • The workload is described as unmanageable because were due.
  • Evidence is limited to one review, so confidence is low despite the severity of the complaint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because the and no workable timeline.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course feels difficult because poor organization and content itself.

Only online evidence exists, and there is .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only one online review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student explicitly reports a negative experience caused by poor communication and assignment timing.

The recommendation judgment comes entirely from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Grading leniency is not directly described, but the work.

Format shift

Only one online review exists, and there is .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

The workload is described as overwhelming because .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with no in-person workload comparison.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review describes poor communication, syllabus issues, and a strongly negative experience.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review mentions assignments as the central problem and .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes poor communication, syllabus problems, and .

Main concern

, making the workload feel unfair and overwhelming.

What students said

“It started with lack of communication and not following the syllabus provided.”
AJ112
“the professor would assign an .”
AJ112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did not have a positive experience with this class at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in communication and workload; credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

10/100

“It started with lack of communication and not following the syllabus provided.”

📚 Workload Timing

5/100

“the professor would assign an .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“I did not have a positive experience with this class at all.”

Theme 1

📣 About Communication

  • It started with lack of communication and not following the syllabus provided.
  • The Dean was contacted multiple times in regards.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Due to the workload, the professor would assign an .
  • Not allowing .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AJ1121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1