AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Garry Johnson

LVNRN021 · FUNDNURSING · NURSING1 · NURS001 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him mainly for , but be cautious with online sections and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful Clinical InstructorFun LecturesCaring MentorInconsistent OrganizationHeavy Nursing Work
  • , humor, clinical support, and caring attitude.
  • The one online review is strongly , and self-teaching.
  • Course workload and not match slides or textbook guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Getting an A seems possible in person with support, but nursing workload and .

Online evidence suggests high effort and poor support, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The nursing content is tough and work-heavy, even when his in-person teaching makes it easier to follow.

Online appears harder because students report self-teaching, while more understandable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict or .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but the online review and one exam complaint create real caution.

, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades seem attainable, but comments about tests being outside the material and .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited to few things and surprise quizzes, while in-person evidence includes both an A and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students describe tough nursing work and the online review says students must teach themselves everything.

Format shift

Online workload sounds especially unsupported, while but helped by the instructor.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most in-person students praise his lectures, humor, knowledge, and support, but online communication is sharply criticized.

Format shift

, while the online section is described as disconnected and unresponsive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention , and clinical work, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions surprise quizzes, while and course preparation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly very positive about engaging lectures, clinical help, and test preparation.

Main concern

and textbook preparation.

What students said

“His teaching style is fun and understandable .”
FUNDNURSING
“The course is tough and there is a lot of work, but Garry helps you through everything.”
NURSING1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes a and surprise quiz timing.

Main concern

Students may feel ignored and unsupported online.

What students said

“Cold, disconnected.”
NURSING1
“ yourself everything.”
NURSING1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz risk is moderate because comments mention surprise quiz timing and .

Surprise QuizzesUnclear Test CoverageFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

slides and textbook, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or final format.

Unclear Test Coverage
“However, the .”
NURSING1
“Tests were about 20% of slides & textbook.”
NURSING1

Online

The but does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, midterms, or finals.

Surprise QuizzesFew Graded Items
“ yourself everything.”
NURSING1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course is tough and there is a lot of work, but Garry helps you through everything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Seriously, just one lecture day with professor in terms of quality.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“Anyone who has him is extremely lucky.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“Don't expect responses.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are great and thorough.
  • His lectures are extremely fun and he is extremely knowledgeable ...
  • His teaching style is fun and understandable .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The course is tough and there is a lot of work, but Garry helps you through everything.
  • Tests were about 20% of slides & textbook.
  • yourself everything.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He is very understandable and his personality is uplifting.
  • This guy really cares and WANTS every student to succeed.
  • He is down to earth and super helpful..

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews span many years and show a , but the online evidence is only one review and several reviews are old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NURSING13 reviews
FUNDNURSING1 review
LVNRN0211 review
NURS0011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1