AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Richard Urrutia

PHOTO22 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProGood FeedbackTech Struggles OnlineSlow GradingFew AssignmentsUnclear A Standard
  • The only review says he is a cool person and .
  • The online course has a light workload, but the and strange.
  • Getting an A may require strong photo quality, not just completing easy written work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The workload is light, but the A standard sounds subjective and tied to excellent photo quality.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course sounds conceptually easy because and .

Only the online format is reviewed, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Participation matters is tagged, but the review does .

Only online evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The student would not take him again because online tech issues, slow grading, and .

The recommendation score is based only on one online review, with no in-person data.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

because an A requires excellent photo work and the student earned a .

Format shift

, and there is no in-person comparison.

Workload

Light

82/100

The workload is light, with eight total assignments and only three required photo assignments.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

, but the online experience is weakened by tech issues and .

Format shift

Teaching quality is based only on one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

The course appears assignment-based, with written projects and photo assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single and good feedback, but weak online tech use and .

Main concern

Online delivery and .

What students said

“Hes not the .”
PHOTO22
“He takes long to grade & its weird.”
PHOTO22
“ and tips.”
PHOTO22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review mentions assignments but does not clearly prove .

Assignments MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Had a total of 8 assignments (only 3 rqd photos) for the whole semester”
PHOTO22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Urrutia is a cool person but not the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and tips.”

⚠️ Online Experience

35/100

“Hes not the .”

📦 Workload

82/100

“Had a total of 8 assignments (only 3 rqd photos) for the whole semester”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Urrutia is a cool person but not the .
  • and tips.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • An A is "Work illustrates a commitment to excellence," basically means really good photos.
  • He takes long to grade & its weird.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, one format, and and exams.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHOTO221 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values