AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

David Ames

AUTO119 · AUTOALL · AUTO172 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you value hands-on automotive learning, but expect uneven lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-on labsSlow lecturesFair gradingKnowledgeableMixed teaching quality
  • Students describe him as knowledgeable and useful for hands-on automotive work.
  • Lecture quality is inconsistent, with one recent review calling it boring, slow, and repetitive.
  • and lab-oriented, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades seem reachable with attention and , but there is no strong evidence of an effortless A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The automotive content sounds manageable for hands-on students, though lectures can be slow and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , but .

Only in-person reviews discuss the class experience, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

but warn that lectures can be boring and forgetful.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grading is described as hard but fair and and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload sounds manageable, with lab and students.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Students praise his knowledge and hands-on value, but the recent lecture complaint lowers confidence in teaching quality.

Format shift

and a recent negative lecture report.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears split between labs, papers, group projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

hands-on teaching and one recent complaint about slow lectures and unrelated quizzes.

Main concern

Lecture quality may feel slow and disorganized.

What students said

“The lecture style is boring and slow.”
AUTO172
“Teaches and lectures well, grades about 50% lab 50% paper.”
AUTOALL
“He's hard but fair.”
AUTO119

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention online quizzes but do not clearly prove the .

Online QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove exam policy or proctoring details.

Online QuizzesUnclear Exam Policy
“The and not related to what is covered in class that week.”
AUTO172

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's hard but fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Teaches and lectures well, grades about 50% lab 50% paper.”

⚠️ Lecture Risk

45/100

“The lecture style is boring and slow.”

⚖️

60/100

“He's hard but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lecture style is boring and slow.
  • Teaches and lectures well, grades about 50% lab 50% paper.

Theme 2

🔧 About Hands-On Learning

  • If you are about hands on, then he's your man.
  • He tends to disappear like a ninja while you're in lab.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's hard but fair.
  • If not, then some light reading will get you by with a B.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and two are very old, so the evidence is limited and uneven.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1191 review
AUTO1721 review
AUTOALL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values