AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Abdie Tabrizi

PHY4A · ENGR10 · MATH71 · MATH013 · STAT63 · ENGR071 · ENGR201 · MATH063 · ENGR50 · MATH63 · MATH201 · STATS204 · ENGR69 · ENGINEERING · ENG66 · ENGR6671 · ENG71 · ENG1 · ENGR66 · TA · MATHINTE · E69 · ENGR6 · STATAABB · ENGR71 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if you want a knowledgeable professor and , and serious study time.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear lecturerTough examsCaring but demandingLots of homeworkEngineering mindset
  • Many , and caring.
  • His , and engineering problem solving.
  • Online reviews are more polarized, with but brutal timed exams in others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with , and studying, but and effort is required.

In-person reviews suggest fair effort can pay off, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The material is often engineering, circuits, stats, or programming content with difficult tests and substantial homework.

Both formats describe challenging content, but online reviews sound more punishing in .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Several reviews say skipping class hurts performance, though some notes and .

, while online reviews focus more on resources and tests.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him because , and prepares serious .

In-person sentiment is broadly positive, while online sentiment and very difficult.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is not an easy grader, but students , and exams tied to notes or homework.

Format shift

and second chances, while online reviews include both redo options and harsh timed exams.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and long study time.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy work, with .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most reviews praise his clarity, knowledge, humor, and care, though a minority call him rude or confusing.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide strong long-term praise, while online reviews are more mixed but .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to combine homework, labs, projects, reports, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly exams and homework, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and care, while repeatedly warning that tests and workload are hard.

Main concern

Exams and .

What students said

“The class itself isn't easy but it's manageable.”
MATH71
“ .”
ENGR71
“ , if you do the work you will do just fine.”
MATH63

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between strong support and biggest concern.

Main concern

, and stressful.

What students said

“Each problem will unlock and you will have only 15-20 minutes to do the problem by hand, scan, and submit; otherwise, 0 points.”
ENGR71
“He provided many resources and also responded to emails very quickly.”
MATH063
“I WORKED MY ASS OFF in this class.”
MATH063

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard and sometimes tightly timed, but some classes provide practice tests, redo options, dropped scores, or makeups.

Timed Canvas ExamsHard ExamsPractice TestsRedo OptionsFinal May Be Tough

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Hard ExamsHomework-Based ExamsTough FinalMake-Up Exams
“ .”
ENGR71
“He explains very well, and .”
ENGR69
“Test and HW could be very difficult, but he will always help you with it.”
ENGR66

Online

Online reviews explicitly , and one strict timed Canvas submission format.

Timed Canvas ExamsWeekly ExamsPractice TestsRedo Options
“Each problem will unlock and you will have only 15-20 minutes to do the problem by hand, scan, and submit; otherwise, 0 points.”
ENGR71
“ , and .”
MATH063
“He gave .”
MATH063

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class itself isn't easy but it's manageable. Put in work and time. Definitely take Tabrizi, you'll learn a lot!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ , if you do the work you will do just fine.”

🔥

42/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“Definitely take Tabrizi, you'll learn a lot!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is VERY knowledgeable of the materials taught.
  • Very helpful and and clearly.
  • He's incredibly smart and is a brilliant lecturer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class itself isn't easy but it's manageable.
  • .
  • Easy A if you do.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He genuinely cares about each and every single one of his students.
  • He provided many resources and also responded to emails very quickly.
  • and very funny.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • This professor is extremely rude and does not care for his students.
  • Dont take this class, he is very rude.
  • I WORKED MY ASS OFF in this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 47 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent themes around strong teaching and .

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGR506 reviews
ENG715 reviews
ENGR714 reviews
MATH0634 reviews
ENGR0713 reviews
Show 20 more courses
ENGR693 reviews
ENG662 reviews
ENGR102 reviews
ENGR662 reviews
E691 review
ENG11 review
ENGINEERING1 review
ENGR2011 review
ENGR61 review
ENGR66711 review
MATH0131 review
MATH2011 review
MATH631 review
MATH711 review
MATHINTE1 review
PHY4A1 review
STAT631 review
STATAABB1 review
STATS2041 review
TA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2