AI Rate Professor

Art

Virginia Miller-Bowen

ART013 · ART012 · ART024 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a , but keep records of grades and deadlines.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringStrong FeedbackAccommodatingFair Growth-Based GradingSome Organization Issues
  • Students mostly praise her as , and feedback-focused.
  • Grades are generally attainable, but .
  • Lectures can be slow, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are A-range and , but missed organization and participation expectations can affect the grade.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The because and feedback, though lectures may be slow rather than effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters in multiple reviews, but the comments do not prove a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and feedback, while a minority warn about organization and .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

as fair and growth-based, but some students report incorrect or early grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

, and participation but do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students consistently praise her care, clarity, examples, and and organization issues.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on art projects, homework, participation, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive and emphasize feedback, care, and .

Main concern

Grade tracking and deadline organization can be inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
ART024
“ and is based on your growth.”
ART012
“she easily loses HW, deadlines change.”
ART024

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the best art teachers I've had! improve your art pieces.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ , and concise.”

💬

86/100

“ .”

⚖️

70/100

“Often; half the class gets up to correct their grade b/c incorrect canvas grade, she easily loses HW, deadlines change.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the !
  • Lectures can be a bit slow but are very informative and prepares you for upcoming projects.
  • , and concise.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • She's also accommodating to disabilities.
  • Very caring as well!
  • Understands that everyone has different skill sets and plans accordingly.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • and is based on your growth.
  • She updates grades quickly and (And re-do's).
  • she easily loses HW, deadlines change.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews over a long time span give useful but somewhat mixed and dated evidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART0133 reviews
ART0122 reviews
ART0242 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values