AI Rate Professor

English

Nita Martin

ENG322 · ENGL330 · ENGL102 · ENG106 · ENG102 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable with , and limited teaching support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard GraderLots Of HomeworkPoor TeachingStrict AttendanceNegative Feedback
  • Most students and unhelpful.
  • , and attendance expectations feel heavy for many students.
  • A few students found the class passable or easy if they did all work and respected her rules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing may be possible through steady work and attendance, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Some students call the class easy, but poor instruction, reading, homework, and suggests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Students repeatedly say attendance and daily participation are required to pass or succeed.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students would not recommend her because they , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and describe failing despite completing work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and weekly assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most comments say she does not teach well, gives little useful guidance, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and quizzes more than major exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and , and highly inconsistent teaching quality.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she does not teach well and gives harsh or .

What students said

“she seriously can not teach!”
ENG106
“A lot of hw and reading.”
ENG102
“the class is easy to pass if you do all the work and come to class everyday.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, or strict proctoring.

Hard Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and nightmare quizzes, but do not clearly prove the .

Hard Tests MentionedQuizzes Mentioned
“ understand”
ENG322
“ .”
ENG102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She isn't the because she doesn't teach well.”

⚖️

18/100

“No matter how hard I try, always receive a D+ and she never tells me the reason why.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“A lot of hw and reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she seriously can not teach!
  • She isn't the because she doesn't teach well.
  • I didn't learn anything from her class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • because even though I do all my work and come to class I'm still failing.
  • Even though she can be a if you do all the work and come to class everyday.
  • No matter how hard I try, always receive a D+

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Attendance

  • A lot of hw and reading.
  • gives lots of
  • come to class everyday.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

and are detailed, but some are old and opinions are somewhat polarized.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1022 reviews
ENG1061 review
ENG3221 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGL3301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1