AI Rate Professor

History

Nanette Regua

17A · HISTORY001 · HISTO17A · HIST17BTV · HISTORY17A · HIST17A · HIST17B · HIST203 · HISTOA · 17A17B · HISTORY · HIST001 · HIST1 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid her unless , and a high-risk grading structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyHeavy readingMandatory attendanceUnclear lectures
  • Most students warn that , and graded harshly.
  • Many reviews say lectures mostly repeat the textbook and do not prepare students well for exams.
  • A smaller group says she is passionate and manageable if students read heavily and study hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is possible for strong readers, but most comments , and grades driven by few high-stakes items.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels difficult because of , and hard exams.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Multiple students say and one review says students can be dropped after three absences.

, and they consistently describe it as strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly , and grades based on a midterm and final.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews mention heavy textbook reading, weekly journals or responses, essays, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Some students find her passionate, but most describe textbook-based lectures, unclear notes, poor organization, and a harsh classroom tone.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are heavily driven by midterms, finals, essays, and items decide the course grade.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a difficult, test-heavy history course with , and polarized views of her teaching.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report harsh exams, unclear lectures, and .

What students said

“overly long, requiring an impossible amount of rote-memorized facts/dates, and graded harshly.”
HIST17A
“This is not an easy class and a lot of effort is required.”
HIST001
“ if you absent 3 times.”
HISTOA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews describe difficult midterms and , and unclear alignment with lectures.

Hard MidtermsHard FinalEssay QuestionsHeavy MemorizationNo Clear Curve

Assessment risk

Strict

17/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals with multiple choice and essay questions, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Hard MidtermsHard FinalEssay QuestionsHeavy Memorization
“Makes you memorize 350 pages of 100 years of history from a textbook for a test that is 1h30m with 50 questions and .”
HIST001
“2 Midterms and Final, 4 Reading Responses, 3 Pop Quizzes.”
HIST17B
“The and the she actually gave us two of the 3 essay questions in advance even with midterms.”
HIST17A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“overly long, requiring an impossible amount of rote-memorized facts/dates, and graded harshly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She teaches straight from the book, so do the reading and classwork goes smoothly.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ ! ! Trust me!”

🧪

17/100

“Mid term and and very hard to get a decent grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are boring and bland. !
  • she just repeat what the book say, doesn't make history interest..
  • She's a nice teacher, very passionate about history and current events.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This is not an easy class and a lot of effort is required.
  • She gives you a lot of reading material.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • and lectures fail to grasp key concepts.
  • Grade is mostly based on a midterm and a final, which is comprised of about 14 chapters.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 39 in-person reviews span many years and strongly , and low recommendation.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 510
1 out of 516

Course coverage

HIST17A13 reviews
HIST0016 reviews
HIST17B6 reviews
HISTORY17A3 reviews
17A2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
HISTORY0012 reviews
17A17B1 review
HIST11 review
HIST17BTV1 review
HIST2031 review
HISTO17A1 review
HISTOA1 review
HISTORY1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 3