AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rosemary Hardin

BIO72 · BIO61 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are comfortable teaching yourself and attending for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind but slowSelf-taught courseQuiz-driven attendanceFew graded itemsMixed lectures
  • Students consistently describe her as kind, but most do not recommend the BIO72 experience.
  • BIO72 reviews report , and heavy self-teaching.
  • BIO61 appears more student-friendly, with , and one index card for exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but comments point to , and little .

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, mostly BIO72.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content feels harder because students report , and learning material before it is taught.

In-person BIO72 reviews are negative, while one BIO61 review says biology was easier to understand.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students say they attended because of quizzes or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because lectures are slow and the course can become heavily self-taught.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with one positive BIO61 exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students mention few graded items, limited points, little , and the need to study daily.

Format shift

In-person BIO72 reviews drive the , while BIO61 sounds more manageable.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The , and sustained preparation despite some decent homework in BIO61.

Format shift

In-person BIO72 evidence shows heavier workload than the single BIO61 review.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She is described as kind, but repeated , and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person teaching feedback is mixed, with BIO72 mostly negative and BIO61 positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and study guides, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but BIO72 students report slow lectures, self-teaching, quizzes, and limited grading opportunities.

Main concern

The main concern is that students may need to teach themselves while attending class for .

What students said

“90% of , and I only came to lecture because .”
BIO72
“ because they are not in order and the important information is hard to weave out.”
BIO72
“I only attended for .”
BIO72

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally standard, with and one review noting a study guide plus one index card of notes.

Reasonable testsStudy guide before examsOne index card of notesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one allowed index card, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book policy.

Reasonable testsStudy guide before examsOne index card of notesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“Tests were reasonable, but and little .”
BIO72
“She also provided a studyguide before exams & allowed 1 index card of notes.”
BIO61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“90% of , and I only came to lecture because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Although she is extremely nice, she is not the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“I hate to say that .”

⚖️

30/100

“Tests were reasonable, but and little .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Although she is extremely nice, she is not the .
  • because they are not in order and the important information is hard to weave out.
  • She made Biology easy .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Definitely a class to study daily for.
  • so you end up just teaching yourself.
  • HW was decent, answers can be found in the .

Theme 3

🪑

  • I only came to lecture because .
  • I only attended for .
  • Her lectures are basically her slides (she just reads off of them) but you go to class for the quizzes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four detailed in-person reviews are fairly consistent for BIO72 but include one positive BIO61 outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO723 reviews
BIO611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values