AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Karin Rowe

COM020 · COMS10 · CS20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

because students describe harsh communication, heavy work, and little academic support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDo not recommendPoor communicationTough graderPaper heavyRestrictive classroom
  • All reviews strongly discourage taking this professor.
  • Students report poor communication, disorganization, and little ability to ask questions.
  • The course is described as , and strictly graded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Tough grading, no late work, many papers, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course is , and disorganized instruction.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course experience as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Students report that skipping class can cause failure and classroom control is strict.

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Every reviewer says they would not recommend the professor due to communication problems and harsh course policies.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

, and many graded papers.

Format shift

, and all evidence points to harshness.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students describe a lot of reading, many papers, exams, and hard workload expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

6/100

Students describe poor communication, disorganization, and an inability to ask questions.

Format shift

, and all are strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention both many papers and exams, so assessment appears split between writing and tests.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, , and limited student support.

Main concern

Students say they cannot ask questions or communicate effectively with the professor.

What students said

“ .”
COMS10
“You are not allowed to speak unless you are spoken to”
CS20
“She is all over the place to the detriment of the students.”
COM020

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and strict course policies, but do .

ExamsMany PapersNo Clear MakeupsReading Required

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove exam book rules or proctoring.

ExamsMany PapersNo Makeups Mentioned
“A lot of papers and .”
COMS10
“ ”
CS20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

6/100

“She is all over the place to the detriment of the students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she doesn't know how to talk well to students.
  • You are not allowed to speak unless you are spoken to
  • She is all over the place to the detriment of the students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of papers and .
  • because .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews across multiple terms are consistent and detailed, but the review count is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COM0201 review
COMS101 review
CS201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values