AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Lori Lujan

SOC011201 · INTRO101 · SOC10 · SOC · SOCIO11 · ETHINFILM · SO · SOC203 · ETH35 · EXCELLENTTHOUG · ETHN35 · SOC011 · SOC11 · SOC212 · ETNICTHUR · SOC010 · ETH011 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear DirectionsHard ExamsOften LateTextbook Dependent
  • Many students describe severe disorganization, lateness, unclear directions, and off-topic lectures.
  • Exam and of hard grading or surprise changes.
  • A minority found the class meaningful or easy if they read the textbook, participated, and used .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students report easy grades through attendance, reading, and , but , and failed or dropped courses.

The single online review gives no easy-A support, while in-person evidence is highly mixed but mostly risky.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The sociology content may not be intellectually hard, but unclear lectures, textbook dependence, and .

Online evidence is negative but limited, while in-person reviews repeatedly say the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple in-person comments say attendance, participation, or not missing class affects passing or grades.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, and the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Despite a few positive reviews, the dominant because of disorganization, unclear expectations, and difficult exams.

The only online , and most in-person reviews also warn against the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Some makeup work and are mentioned, but many students report , and low class performance.

Format shift

Strict grading concerns are mostly from in-person reviews; the online .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload varies, but essays, , and unclear deadlines make the burden heavy.

Format shift

Workload detail is almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the online review focuses on confusion.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear lectures, lateness, disorganization, poor communication, and off-topic class time.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, but the in-person sample provides much stronger evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Grades appear , and textbook-based exams, with some homework and participation.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, repeatedly citing lateness, disorganization, unclear expectations, difficult tests, and textbook dependence.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“Be prepared to fail.”
SOC10
“ .”
SOC011
“ .”
SOC011

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and , and unhelpful.

Main concern

The main concern is poor organization and low support.

What students said

“Do not take this professor.”
SOC010
“ and makes it hard for us to succeed.”
SOC010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students describe hard, unclear, textbook-based exams and .

Hard ExamsEssay QuestionsTextbook-Based ExamsUnclear Test CoverageNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and strong textbook dependence.

Hard ExamsEssay QuestionsTextbook-Based ExamsUnclear Test Coverage
“ .”
SOC011
“she also has an :(”
011
“ !”
INTRO101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Literally the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ and often got off topic”

⚠️

25/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“stay away from this teacher as much as .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and often got off topic
  • lectures are irrelevant and most of the things mentioned in class aren't even on the test.
  • She knows the subject well and made it very relatable.

Theme 2

📚

  • .
  • .
  • and hard to understand.
  • Simple just show up and write down the notes, easy A.

Theme 3

⏰ About Organization

  • Late constantly,
  • She is NEVER on time
  • doesn't give specific dates on hw needed to be turned in or days of tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide detailed and consistent evidence, with repeated themes of disorganization and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 510
3 out of 513
2 out of 511
1 out of 540

Course coverage

SOC1010 reviews
SOC119 reviews
SOC0107 reviews
ETH0116 reviews
SOC0115 reviews
Show 13 more courses
0111 review
ETH351 review
ETHINFILM1 review
ETHN351 review
ETNICTHUR1 review
EXCELLENTTHOUG1 review
INTRO1011 review
SO1 review
SOC1 review
SOC0112011 review
SOC2031 review
SOC2121 review
SOCIO111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2