AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Christina Shih

PSYCH01 · GENPSYCH01 · BIOPSYCH030 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you have no other option and can teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHard gradingPoor supportAvoid if possibleMandatory in-class work
  • All four reviews are strongly negative and describe poor teaching organization.
  • Students , and frustrating communication.
  • Attendance appears required for participation or in-class assignments, but students say class time has little value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and unforgiving test scoring.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content may not be inherently impossible, but disorganized lectures and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Reviews say students must show up for participation and in-class assignments that cannot be made up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students advise avoiding her because the , and support are consistently criticized.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students directly call her a and describe a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The main burden is not volume but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Every review rates teaching poorly and cites terrible lectures, disorganization, or lack of help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and in-class assignments more than regular homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and harshly graded class with little useful instructor support.

Main concern

Students , and unhelpful responses when they need support.

What students said

“ . and the lectures are terrible.”
PSYCH01
“ .”
GENPSYCH01
“ and has no idea what she is doing.”
BIOPSYCH030

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

High-Point TestsHarsh Test ScoringNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and harsh scoring, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

High-Point TestsHarsh Test Scoring
“Her test are out of 150 points.”
BIOPSYCH030
“if you don't get a 100% on the test you lose 50 points.”
BIOPSYCH030

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . and the lectures are terrible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ and has no idea what she is doing.”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“ and the lectures are terrible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super boring class.
  • .
  • Can barely understand her because of her accent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and the lectures are terrible.
  • Her test are out of 150 points.
  • if you don't get a 100% on the test you lose 50 points.

Theme 3

🚩 About Support and Communication

  • She does not want to help a student pass.
  • replies back once every 4 to 5 emails sent to her.
  • Wants nothing to do with you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent relative to each other and strongly consistent in tone.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYCH012 reviews
BIOPSYCH0301 review
GENPSYCH011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1